Abstract: Based on the Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Criminal Cases of Doping and the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law, this article adopts the methods of comparative analysis, literature review and logical analysis to make a normative analysis of the criminal law governance path of doping crimes, explore the issues concerning criminal law governance of doping crimes and propose improvement ideas. This article points out that even though the current criminal law governance system of doping crimes includes four regulatory paths, there are still problems that need to be urgently improved: ambiguous judgment of crimes, unclear connotation of the elements of crimes and weak connection between the legal norms of execution and punishment. The criminal law governance system should be reformed and perfected in three aspects: first, improve the crime naming system of doping crimes; second, clarify the connotation of the elements of doping crimes; third, build a cooperative "law enforcement-judicial" working mechanism for doping.

Key words: doping crimes, criminal law governance, governance path, existing issues, improvement ideas