Abstract: Sun Yang's refusal is essentially an athlete's struggle against WADA authoritarianism, even though it is completely inappropriate. Based on a survey of athletes' attitudes towards doping in recent years, the study analyzed the issue of athlete participation in global anti-doping governance. The study found that athletes generally support anti-doping, indicating that WADA and anti-doping work are necessary. However, working principles and methods such as the whereabouts information mechanism, the biological passport system, and the strict responsibility principle violate the athletes' privacy, threaten their personal safety and property rights, and even hurt the athletes personality and dignity. This has led to dissatisfaction among athletes with WADA and its governance system. With the intensification of conflicts, athletes have begun to use various channels to request the global anti-doping system with WADA as the core to rethink the legitimacy of organizations and behaviors, improve the transparency and compliance of anti-doping work, and solve athletes' anti-excitement Marginalization in agent governance. By analyzing the Anti-Doping Charter of Athlete Rights, the study believes that the promotion of athletes' democratic status in global anti-doping system can be achieved through decision-making, governance, and regulatory participation.

Key words: anti doping, global governance, athlete right, democracy in sport