美国搏击赛事制度治理特征与启示

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.06.007

Abstract

Abstract: institutional governance is an important means for the modernization of national governance capacity and governance system. Using the methods of literature and expert interview, this paper explores the characteristics of American fight event system governance from the institutional level, in order to provide enlightenment for optimizing China's fight event governance system. It is found that the institutional governance characteristics of American fight events lie in the construction of three-level diversified subject cooperative governance structure; The improvement of the joint governance mechanism of external supervision and internal implementation; The perfection of institutional governance system under the guidance of law; The formation of "one core and multiple" horizontal decentralized governance model. The specific characteristics of institutional governance are reflected in: standardizing the commercial behavior of promoters with "legal quota + qualification review"; Restrict the professional qualification and behavior of brokers by multiple means such as "contract + limit + margin"; Protect athletes' bodies, protect athletes' rights and interests and supervise athletes' violation of discipline with special policies and regulations; Improve the selection quality of referees by quantitative standards, and curb the corruption of referees by legal system and government audit; Clear behavior restriction clauses and anti-corruption measures are used to regulate the violation of rules and disciplines of officials. Local enlightenment: under the leadership of the government, China's combat events should promote the improvement of the governance model of "Industry Association implementation + event organization assistance + social public supervision"; Clearly define the rights and responsibilities of multiple subjects and form a vertical linkage collaborative governance system; Build or improve the specific system of combat events and improve the management system covering key stakeholders.

Key words: institutional governance, Fighting events, American system, Collaborative governance, Promoters, agent, sports industry

CLC Number:

G811.31

WANG Haifeng, WU Xiaoyuan, LI Lehu, SUN Jinhai. Institutional Governance Characteristics of American Fight Events and Local Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2021, 47(6): 32-38.

References

[1] 郭宇立.美国的大国成长道路:制度治理与战略选择[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011:44.
[2] 夏征农.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2003:523.
[3] 国务院办公厅.国务院关于加快发展体育产业促进体育消费的若干意见[EB/OL].(2014-10-20)[2018-05-25].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/10/20/content_9152.htm.
[4] 徐泉森,白晋湘.美国职业格斗赛事UFC研究[J].体育文化导刊,2013(11):128-130.
[5] 彭国强,高庆勇.美国大学竞技体育的制度治理及其特征[J].成都体育学院学报,2020,46(4):74-81.
[6] 李智.国际足联腐败案冲击下体育自治的反思与完善[J].天津体育学院学报,2016,31(4):303-309.
[7] BELLO F D,CIRO J B,AMTMANN J A,et al.Ending MMA combat, specific grappling techniques according to the type of the Outcome[J]Journal of Human Kinetics,2019,67(1):271-280
[8] GALLAT.Antitrust Law and public alternatives for professional sports leagues[J].Labor Law J,2013,(3):66-179.
[9] 浦义俊,吴贻刚.镜鉴与反思:美国竞技体育发展中的政府治理及其困境[J].山东体育学院学报,2016,32(4):8-15.
[10] 高升,王家宏.职业体育与专业体育的制度非均衡研究[J].成都体育学院学报,2021(4):80-85.
[11] 周青山.职业体育经纪人法律制度的美国经验与中国前景[J].体育成人教育学刊,2020,36(5):1-6.
[12] WILLEM A,GIRGINOV V,KRISTINETOOHEY.Governing bodies of sport as knowledge brokers in Sport-for-All communities of practice[J].Sport Managemengt Review,2019,22(5):584-599.
[13] 王海峰,鲍善军,叶伟,等.新中国成立以来我国搏击运动员管理制度的演变、困境与优化[J].武汉体育学院学报,2020,54(12):95-100.
[14] 孙伟,王海峰,王德新.我国职业拳击发展分析[J].体育文化导刊,2010(9):53-56.
[15] 张喜燕,王海峰.国际比较视域下中美职业拳击赛事运作模式的研究[J].体育科技文献通报,2020,28(6):1-3,170.
[16] 金立刚.深耕格斗事业,让运动经纪与商业完美结合——访中国MMA元老级推广人、UFC在华指定合作经纪人乔博[J].中国商界,2020(4):104-107.
[17] 董鹏,程传银,赵富学.美国终极格斗锦标赛发展历程、经验及启示[J].体育文化导刊,2017(12):179-183.
[18] BROOKS G,ALEEM A,BUTTONM.Fraud and corruption in boxing[J].Fraud,Corruption and Sport,2013(3):153-168.
[19] NESTI L.The 2010 "agreement on mutual enforcement of debarment decisions" and its impact for the fight against fraud and corruption in public procurement[J].Journal of Public Procurement,2014,14(1):213-216.
[20] 吴小圆,任占兵.常态化疫情防控期间的体育赛事政策研究——基于14份省级政策文本的要素分析与政策建议[J].体育成人教育学刊,2021,37(2):38-43.
[21] 刘次琴,金育强,刘君雯.治理理论视角下的中国体育管理体制改革[J].体育学刊,2007(8):118-120.
[22] 李睿智,郭树理.国际体育仲裁院对体育组织规则与决定的审查,成都体育学院学报,2021(2):49-56.

Institutional Governance Characteristics of American Fight Events and Local Enlightenment

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	QIN Dan, DU Chengrun, XING Xuefeng, WANG Zipu. Research on The Influencing Mechanism of Digital Economy-Driven High-quality Development of Sports Industry [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2024, 50(3): 27-36.
[2]	TIAN Cuicui, XIAO Shuhong. Exploration and Practice of Digital Twin Technology Enabling the Digital Transformation of Sports Industry [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2024, 50(3): 37-42.
[3]	WANG Haifeng, WU Xiaoyuan, MA Wenbo, YUE Jianjun, ZHAO Tianyi. Institutional Governance of American Sports Promoters in the Context of Modernization of Governance Capacity and Its Implications [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(6): 116-121.
[4]	LU Zhiqin, CHEN Linxiang, SHEN Lingli. Development Trend, Challenges and Countermeasures of Digital Development of Sports Industry in China [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(3): 35-41.
[5]	ZHU Zhehui, MOU Linlin, DAI Jiafan, SHEN Keyin, CAI Binyao. Practical Exploration, Realistic Dilemma and Countermeasures of AIoT Enabling Sports and Fitness Industry [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(3): 42-48.
[6]	ZHU Luojing, YANG Yeling, LI Bing. How Can Sports Industry Projects Be Embedded into Rural Area Development? ——A Comparative Study Based on the Two Development Models of Villagers Autonomy and Government Dominance [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(3): 49-54.
[7]	NIU Ruixin, LI Yanling. Development of Public Sports Service PPP Projects in China: Based on CPPPC Database [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(2): 59-65.
[8]	FANG Wei. Integration and Expansion: Study on the High-Quality Development of Sports Industry in Sichuan Province [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(2): 121-127.
[9]	WANG Xianliang, GUO Xueqing, ZHOU Tingting. Study on the Mechanism of Global Value Chain-Global Innovation Chain Coupling in Driving the High-quality Development of Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry ——Based on the Analysis of R&D Investment, Profitability and Earnings Quality of Listed Enterprise [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(6): 24-30.
[10]	ZHANG Dianbo, ZHU Yan, YUAN Shiyi, SHANG Wanting. Analysis of Policy Instrument Characteristics and Optimization Strategies for the High-quality Development of Chinese Ice and Snow Industry [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(6): 38-44.
[11]	GUO Huifang, ZHANG Dachao. Sports Special Bond Issuance in China: Historical Background, Characteristics and High Quality Development Strategies [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(6): 45-50.
[12]	XIE Chunlong, ZHENG Guohua. Research on the Relationship between Self-Concept Consistency, Brand Attachment and Brand Loyalty of Sporting Goods Consumers Based on SEM [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(6): 130-135.
[13]	DING Yunxia. Conceptualization, Practice Progress and Development Prospect of Sports Space [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(5): 34-39.
[14]	CHEN Lei, HE Yi, CHEN Yuanxin. Research on the Evolution and Development of Sports Service Complex from the Perspective of Self-organization Theory: Taking Gaolan Outdoor Sports and Leisure Town as An Example [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(5): 46-52.
[15]	Chen Ou. Research on the Foundation, Predicament and Path of the Sports Industry’s Synergistic Development in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle [J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(5): 90-96.