Regulatory Paths for Applying Artificial Intelligence Technology to Large-scale Sports Events————Take Artificial Intelligence Video Surveillance as An Example
LI Haotian1, LI Yinhui2
1. School of Law of Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei 430064; 2. Department of Physical Education of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan Hubei 430073
LI Haotian, LI Yinhui. Regulatory Paths for Applying Artificial Intelligence Technology to Large-scale Sports Events————Take Artificial Intelligence Video Surveillance as An Example[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2025, 51(1): 25-33.
[1] FRANCE.LOI n° 2023-380 du 19 mai 2023 relative aux jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques de 2024 et portant diverses autres dispositions [ EB/OL]. (2023-05-19) [2024-01-10]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/dossierlegislatif/JORFDOLE000046777392/. [2] LUSWETI S W, ODAWA J. Towards the advanced technology of smart, secure and mobile stadiums: a perspective of fifa world Cup Qatar 2022[J]. Computer Science and Information Technology, 2023, 11(2): 21 - 30. [3] 曾珍,吕万刚. 大型体育赛事公共安全风险精细化治理:动因分析、价值场景与推进路径[J]. 武汉体育学院学报,2020,54(11):13. [4] SUGDEN, JOHN. Watched by the Games: Surveillance and Security at the Olympics[J]. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 2012, 47(3): 414 - 429. [5] MOSCOW TIMES. Facial Recognition Tech Leads to World Cup Arrest[EB/OL].(2018-07-03)[2025-01-15]. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/07/03/facial-recognition-tech-leads-to-world-cup-arrest-a62096. [6] LUSWETI S W, ODAWA J. Towards the advanced technology of smart, secure and mobile stadiums: a perspective of fifa world Cup Qatar 2022[J]. Computer Science and Information Technology, 2023, 11(2): 21 - 30. [7] COLLINGRIDGE D. Controlling technology (response to Johnston)[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1985, 15(2): 373 - 380. [8] FINCK M, PALLAS F. They who must not be identified—distinguishing personal from non-personal data under the GDPR[J]. International Data Privacy Law, 2020, 1(1): 11 - 36. [9] POLONETSKY J, TENE O, FINCH K. Shades of gray: Seeing the full spectrum of practical data de-intentification[J]. Santa Clara Law Review, 2016, 56(1): 593. [10] 网信上海.公民个人信息遭境外披露兜售,上海市一政务信息系统技术服务公司被行政处罚[ EB/OL]. (2023-09-15) [2024-01-10]. https://news.cctv.com/2023/09/15/ARTI9iO75vnfCiJ7jqpxkOIP230915.shtml [11] 赵精武. 人脸识别技术应用的利益权衡与合法性认定[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2024,42(1):100. [12] 徐伟康,林朝晖. 人工智能体育应用的风险与法律规制——兼论我国《体育法》修改相关条款的补足[J]. 体育学研究,2021,35(4):29. [13] EUROPEAN UNION.The EU Artificial Intelligence Act [EB/OL]. (2023-05-19) [2024-01-10]. https://www.artificial-intelligence-act.com/. [14] HELBERGER N, DIAKOPOULOS N. ChatGPT and the AI Act[J]. Internet Policy Review, 2023, 12(1): 1. [15] 张凌寒. 生成式人工智能的法律定位与分层治理[J]. 现代法学,2023,45(4):126. [16] 王锡锌. 数治与法治:数字行政的法治约束[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2022,36(6):17. [17] 苏宇. 大型语言模型的法律风险与治理路径[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2024,40(1):85. [18] BAI Y, KADAVATH S, KUNDU S, et al. Constitutional AI Harmlessness from AI feedback[EB/OL]. (2022-12-15) [2024-12-31]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073. [19] 许可. 数据安全法:定位、立场与制度构造[J]. 经贸法律评论,2019,2(3):52 - 66. [20] 丁晓东. 基于信任的自动化决策:算法解释权的原理反思与制度重构[J]. 中国法学,2022,39(1):99. [21] 王苑. 完全自动化决策拒绝权之正当性及其实现路径——以《个人信息保护法》第24条第3款为中心[J]. 法学家,2022,37(5):72. [22] PALMIOTTO F. When Is a Decision Automated? A Taxonomy for a Fundamental Rights Analysis[J]. German Law Journal, 2024, 25(2): 210 - 236. [23] 张涛. 通过算法审计规制自动化决策以社会技术系统理论为视角[J]. 中外法学,2024,36(1):1. [24] 解正山. 算法决策规制——以算法“解释权”为中心[J]. 现代法学,2020,42(1):187.