主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 7-13.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2016.03.002

• 探索与争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

梳理与反思:60年来中国学生体质力量素质测试的科学性考量

孙有平1, 2, 范洪彬1, 2, 3, 季浏1, 2   

  1. 1.青少年健康评价与运动干预教育部重点实验室,上海 200241;
    2.华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海 200241;
    3.遵义医学院体育学院,贵州 遵义 563000
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-13 出版日期:2016-05-15 发布日期:2016-05-27
  • 作者简介:孙有平,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:青少年体质健康评价,运动训练课程与教学;E-mail:sunyouping@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    上海高校创新能力提升计划竞争性引导项目:青少年power工程协同创新中心(44891400);“青少年健康评价与运动干预教育部重点实验室”建设项目(40500-541235-14203/004)。

Discussion and Reflection on the Scientificity of China’s Student’s Physical Fitness Tests in 60 years

SUN Youping1,2, FAN Hongbin1,2,3,JI Liu1,2   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Adolescent Health Assessment and Exercise Intervention, Ministry of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241;
    2.College of Physical Education & Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241;
    3.Zunyi Medical College,Zunyi Guizhou 563000
  • Received:2015-07-13 Online:2016-05-15 Published:2016-05-27

摘要: 自1954年中国颁布第一个官方学生体质测试标准以来,中国学生体质力量测试已经走过60年,但其指标设置的科学性尚需考证。新中国“劳卫制”时期的力量素质指标体系偏重力量-运动技能指标,躯干力量指标缺失;“锻炼标准”时期力量—运动技能指标仍被倚重,但增加了女性躯干力量指标;“健康标准”时期指标设置趋于一般力量,但不够全面。身体局部指标设置中上肢指标数量繁多且依据性别、年龄选测要求较高,其可靠性与有效性较低;躯干力量测试指标单一(仰卧起坐)并有年龄及性别限制,且测试方法的有效性较低;立定跳远为下肢唯一测试指标且有“技能学习”等因素影响争议,有效性有待实验证实。未来中国学生体质力量测试指标设置可进行如下优选:上肢修正引体向上、俯卧撑(男)或屈膝俯卧撑(女)三选一,躯干多种仰卧起坐优选与补充俯卧背伸和平板支撑,下肢进行立定跳远与两种下蹲跳实验验证。

关键词: 学生体质, 健康标准, 力量素质, 评价指标

Abstract: Student’s physical fitness test has been implemented for 60 years since 1954 when the first official physical fitness test standard for students was promulgated in China. However, the scientificity of its indexes remains to be verified. During the "labor preparation and national defense system" period, physical fitness test put emphasis on the strength-movement skill indexes, but there were not any indexes for trunk strength; during the "national standard for sports exercise" period, physical fitness test still stressed the strength-movement skill indexes, while female’s torso strength indexes were added; during the "national student physical health standard" period, physical fitness test was designed to include indexes for general strength, but remained incomplete. Among the indexes designed for different body parts, there are more indexes for the upper limbs than that for other body parts. The indexes for upper limbs are miscellaneous and have higher requirements for student’s age and gender. Therefore its reliability and validity is relatively low; the torso strength indexesare simple (only sit-ups included) and have limitations for student’s age and gender. Besides, the efficiency of the testing method is relatively low.Standing long jump is the only index for lower limb test. However, the index is in dispute because it is influenced by skillslearning. Therefore it’s validity is subject to further verification through experiments. In the future, indexes for student’sphysical fitness test in China can be optimized in the following aspects: For upper limb test, choosing one from among modified pull-ups,push-ups (for male) and knee push-ups (for female). For torso test, choosing the best from among various sit-up movements,supplementing trunk extension and plank. For lower limb test, standing long jump and the current two kinds of squat jump need to be verified through experiments.

Key words: Student’s Physical Fitness, Physical Health Standard, Strength, Assessment Index

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发