主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 151-160.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.02.16

• 学校体育学与运动人体科学 • 上一篇    

我国中小学体育教师在职培训满意度量表的研制

吴本连1, 刘倩倩2, 张海燕3   

  1. 1. 杭州师范大学 体育学院, 浙江 杭州 311121;
    2. 海口经济学院 武林风体育学院, 海南 海口 571127;
    3. 杭州师范大学 档案馆, 浙江 杭州 311121
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-02 发布日期:2025-04-28
  • 作者简介:吴本连,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:学校体育;E-mail:blianwu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省“十四五”第二批研究生省级教学改革项目《体育课程与教学论》课程思政教学模式改革与实践”(JGCG2024385 );国家社科重点项目“新时代卓越体育教师教育标准体系研究”(21ATY009)。

Development of an in-service training satisfaction scale for primary and secondary school physical education teachers in China

WU Benlian1, LIU Qianqian2, ZHANG Haiyan3   

  1. 1. College of Physical Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 311121;
    2. Wulinfeng College of Physical Education , HaikouUniversity of Economics, Haikou Hainan 571127;
    3. Archives Building, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 311121
  • Received:2024-07-02 Published:2025-04-28

摘要: 依据国家相关文件、教师教育相关理论以及体育教师在职培训的实际情况,研制我国中小学体育教师在职培训满意度量表,为中小学体育教师培训的绩效评价和质量提升提供相应的测量工具。在文献分析的基础上,界定了中小学体育教师在职培训满意度的概念以及相关维度,并建立条目池;随后采用专家问卷调查,完成量表条目初筛;最后运用初始量表进行测试,并分析项目鉴别度、区辨力、信度、效度等对量表进行科学性检验和修订。研制出的量表包括培训制度、培训资源、培训过程、培训服务和培训效果5个维度,共35个条目。分量表和总量表的重测信度在0.780~0.919之间(P<0.01),Cronbach’s α系数在0.754~0.904之间(P<0.01);各条目因子载荷在0.415~0.876之间,符合量表研制的测量学指标要求。该量表研制程序规范,信效度理想,可作为相关培训工作的科学化标准化的测评工具。

关键词: 中小学, 体育教师, 在职培训, 满意度, 量表

Abstract: To develop an in-service training satisfaction scale for primary and secondary school physical education teachers in China based on relevant national documents, teacher education-related theories and the actual situation of physical education teachers' in-service training, so as to provide a corresponding measurement tool for the performance evaluation and quality improvement of primary and secondary school physical education teachers’ training. Based on the literature analysis, the concept of in-service training satisfaction of primary and secondary school physical education teachers and related dimensions were defined and a pool of items was established; subsequently, an expert questionnaire was used to complete the initial screening of the scale items; finally, the initial scale was used to test and analyse item discrimination, district discrimination, reliability and validity to test and revise the scientific validity of the scale. The developed scale included 5 dimensions of training system, training resources, training process, training services and training effectiveness, with a total of 35 items. The retest reliability of the subscales and the total scale ranged from 0.780 to 0.919 (P<0.01), and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from 0.754 to 0.904 (P<0.01); the factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.415 to 0.876, which met the requirements of the measurement indexes for the development of the scale. Conclusion: The scale was developed with standardized procedures and satisfactory reliability, and can be used as a scientific and standardized assessment tool for related training work.

Key words: Primary and secondary schools, Physical education teachers, In-service training, Satisfaction, Scale

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发