德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.04.010

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 70-75.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.04.010

• 运动训练与运动人体科学 • 上一篇下一篇

德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证

李博¹, 刘亚男², 施利娟³, 朱晓玲⁴, 刘阳^5,6

1.南通大学体育科学学院江苏南通 226019;
2.上海市中原路第一小学(分校),上海 200400;
3.上海市教师教育学院,上海 200234;
4.上海市杨浦区教育学院,上海 200092;
5.上海体育大学体育教育学院,上海 200438;
6.上海市学生体质健康研究中心,上海 200438

收稿日期:2022-07-20 修回日期:2023-04-20 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-08-09
通讯作者: 刘阳,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:运动健康促进;E-mail:docliuyang@hotmail.com。
作者简介:李博,博士,讲师,研究方向:学校体育;E-mail:wangqiulibo@163.com。
基金资助:
国家社科基金 “体育活动对幼儿基本动作技能及体质健康促进的实证研究”(19BTY077);上海市海外高层次人才项目(TP2022102);上海市教育科学研究一般项目“基于体育素养提升的小学生基本运动技能发展研究”(C2021086);上海市教育科学研究一般项目“体育素养视域下上海市小学生体质健康发展研究”(C2022243)。

Analysis and Validation of German Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder (KTK)

Li Bo¹, LIU Yanan², SHI Lijuan³, ZHU Xiaoling⁴, LIU Yang^5,6

1. Institute of Sports Science, Nantong University, Nantong Jiangsu 226019;
2. No. 1 Primary School, Zhongyuan Road, Shanghai, 200400;
3. Shanghai Teacher Education College, Shanghai 200234;
4. Yangpu District College of Education, Shanghai, 200092;
5. School of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438;
6. Shanghai Student Physical Health Research Center, Shanghai 200438

Received:2022-07-20 Revised:2023-04-20 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:验证德国儿童身体协调性测试(Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder,KTK)在中国小学生基本运动技能测试中的信效度。方法:选取上海市某小学145名1～5年级学生,年龄(8.98±1.48)岁,应用KTK和美国粗大动作发展测试(Test of Gross Motor Development, TGMD)进行学生的基本运动技能测试,对KTK的信效度进行统计检验。结果:小学生的KTK平均得分为178.20±41.68,且随着年级的增长得分逐级增高(F=11.94,P<0.001)。重测信度ICC为0.966～0.992;内部一致性信度Cronbach's α系数为0.820;结构效度中因子分析模型适配良好(x²/df=0.036,RMSEA=0.001,AGFI=0.999);同时效度中与TGMD总分具有中等程度相关(r=0.639,P<0.001)。结论:KTK在中国小学生基本运动技能测试中具有较好的信效度,可以作为小学生基本运动技能发展的有效评价工具。

关键词: 儿童身体协调性测试, 基本运动技能, 信度, 效度, 学校体育, 稳定性技能

Abstract: Objective: To verify the reliability and validity of German Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder (KTK) in the fundamental movement skills test of Chinese primary school students. Methods: 145 grades 1-5 students (age: [8.98±1.48] years old) from a primary school in Shanghai were selected as test subjects, and KTK and the American Gross Motor Development Test (TGMD) were used to test students' fundamental movement skills. Statistical test for validity. Results: The average KTK score of primary school students was 178.20±41.68, and the score increased with grades (F=11.94, P<0.001). The ICC in the test-retest reliability is between 0.966 and 0.992; the Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the internal consistency reliability is 0.820; the factor analysis model is well fitted in the construct validity (x²/df=0.036, RMSEA=0.001, AGFI=0.999); there was a moderate correlation between the concurrent validity and the TGMD total score (r=0.639, P<0.001). Conclusion: KTK has good reliability and validity in the fundamental movement skills test of Chinese primary school students, and it can be used as an effective evaluation tool for the development of fundamental movement skills of primary school students.

Key words: Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder (KTK), Fundamental Movement Skill (FMS), reliability, validity, school physical education, stability skills

中图分类号:

G807.2

李博, 刘亚男, 施利娟, 朱晓玲, 刘阳. 德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 70-75.

Li Bo, LIU Yanan, SHI Lijuan, ZHU Xiaoling, LIU Yang. Analysis and Validation of German Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder (KTK)[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(4): 70-75.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.04.010

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V49/I4/70

参考文献

[1] 季浏. 我国《义务教育体育与健康课程标准(2022年版)》解读[J]. 体育科学, 2022, 42(5): 3-17.
[2] 李博, 刘阳, 陈思同, 等. 儿童青少年基本运动技能测评工具研究及启示[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2018, 42(3): 8-16,28.
[3] KIPHARD E J, SCHILLING F. Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder: KTK[M]. Weinheim: Belz test, 1974:1-18.
[4] KIPHARD E J, SCHILLING F. Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder: KTK[M]. Weinheim:Belz test, 2007:1-2.
[5] 李博, 刁玉翠, 李静, 等. 美国粗大动作发展测试(TGMD)解析与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(2): 58-64.
[6] 刁玉翠, 董翠香, 李静. 大肌肉动作发展测验上海市常模的建立[J]. 中国体育科技, 2018, 54(2): 98-104.
[7] 宁科, 沈信生, 邵晓军. 3～6岁幼儿移动性动作发展与感知身体能力关系的实证研究[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2016, 39(12): 74-81.
[8] 李冉, 刘展, 李小京, 等. 约束模型视角下幼儿基本动作技能发展的教学干预研究——以山东省潍坊市一农村幼儿园学前儿童为例[J]. 体育科学, 2021, 41(2): 51-58.
[9] TERWEE C B, MOKKINK L B, KNOL D L, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist[J]. Quality of Life Research, 2011, 21(4): 651-657.
[10] HULTEEN R M, BARNETT L M, TRUE L, et al. Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: A systematic review[J]. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2020, 38(1): 1-82.
[11] FARROKHIFAR M, SHARIFIAN M B B, ESMAEILZADEH R. KTK motor test: review of the main influencing variables[J]. Revista paulista de pediatria, 2018, 37(3): 372-381.
[12] GARN A C, WEBSTER E K. Bifactor structure and model reliability of the test of gross motor development— 3rd edition[J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2020, 24(1):60-66.
[13] EDDY L H, BINGHAM D D, CROSSLEY K L, et al. The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review[J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15(8): e 0237919.
[14] KOO T K, LI M Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research[J]. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016, 15(2): 155-163.
[15] CHAN Y H. Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis[J]. Singapore Med J, 2003, 44(12): 614-619.
[16] STREINER D L. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency[J]. J Pers Assess, 2003, 80(1): 99-103.
[17] HEEBNER N R, AKINS J S, LEPHART S M, et al. Reliability and validity of an accelerometry based measure of static and dynamic postural stability in healthy and active individuals[J]. Gait Posture, 2015, 41(2): 535-539.
[18] BLAND J M, ALTMAN D G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies[J]. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999, 8(2): 135-160.
[19] 郑文智, 吴文毅. 结构方程模型拟合评鉴:整体拟合、内部拟合与复核效度检验[J]. 心理学探新, 2014, 38(1): 57-61.
[20] 李跃平, 黄子杰. 验证性因子分析在量表结构效度考核中作用[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2007, 23(10): 1198-1199.
[21] SEEFELDT V. Developmental motor patterns: implications for elementary school physical education[J]. Psychology of motor behavior and sport, 1979, 36(6): 314-323.
[22] LIMA R A, BUGGE A, PFEIFFER K A, et al. Tracking of gross motor coordination from childhood into adolescence[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2017, 88(1): 52-59.
[23] MOREIRA J P A, LOPES M C, MIRANDA-JúNIOR M V, et al. Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder (KTK) for brazilian children and adolescents: factor analysis, invariance and factor score[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 19(10):2524.
[24] VANDORPE B, VANDENDRIESSCHE J, LEFEVRE J, et al. The KörperkoordinationsTest für Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders[J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2011, 21(3): 378-388.
[25] RUDD J, BUTSON M L, BARNETT L, et al. A holistic measurement model of movement competency in children[J]. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2016, 34(5): 477-485.
[26] GHEYSEN F, LOOTS G, VAN W H. Motor development of deaf children with and without cochlear implants[J]. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 2008, 13(2): 215-224.
[27] VANDORPE B, VANDENDRIESSCHE J, LEFEVRE J, et al. The Korperkoordinations Test fur Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2011, 21(3): 378.
[28] RUDD J R, BARNETT L M, BUTSON M L, et al. Fundamental movement skills are more than run, throw and catch: The role of stability skills[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(10): 15.
[29] 李博, 刘阳. 人工判定儿童基本运动技能的发展是否可信?[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2020, 44(1): 48.

德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证

Analysis and Validation of German Körperkoordinationtest für Kinder (KTK)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱荣, 杨钰鑫, 高长征. 学校体育课后服务质量提升策略调适[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(3): 92-100.
[2]	覃立, 黎吉权. “双减”政策下体育教育公平审思:意义解读、问题防范与发展路向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 120-126.
[3]	顾正秋, 黎涌明. 课次主观疲劳度的信效度及方法学影响因素[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(1): 143-151.
[4]	邵天逸, 李启迪. 偏离与归正:快乐体育若干基本问题回溯性反思[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(6): 86-93.
[5]	胡惠芳. 中国初中毕业升学体育考试政策的演进特征与推进策略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 12-21.
[6]	孙科, 杨帆, 朱天宇, 樊菁. 论中国式体育教育现代化[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 38-46.
[7]	何丽娟, 茹秀英. “四位一体”目标下小学体育教学学生自我评价研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 123-130.
[8]	张晓林, 关清文, 舒为平. 联合国教科文组织优质体育教育政策的演进历程、特征及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 97-105.
[9]	吴相雷, 陶玉流, 李卫东, 彭庆文, 李奕霖, 叶巍. 学科内容知识视域下我国体育教育专业运动技术技能课程教学改革路径研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 105-111.
[10]	薛鹏飞, 曹景川. 学校体育高质量发展:价值意蕴、现实困境与推进策略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 112-118.
[11]	唐炎, 马晓. 身体活动强度视角下的体育学习投入模型及其学段差异[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 1-9.
[12]	郇昌店, 杨涛. 新中国青少年体质健康政策的演进历程、逻辑转变和优化方向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(1): 104-110.
[13]	李艳茹, 党许诺. “双减”背景下课后体育服务的现状、问题及优化研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 51-56.
[14]	张丽军,孙有平. 走向主动健康:后疫情时代运动健康教育与大数据融合发展研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 47-52.
[15]	杨燕国,汪晓赞,孔琳. 借鉴与纾解:芬兰“学校运动计划”的特征及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 113-120.