主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 134-142.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.02.14

• 体育史与体育文化 • 上一篇    

逆写典范:日本弓道的文化反思与当代启示

常显玲1, 陈雨石2, 贠琰3   

  1. 1. 成都体育学院 武术学院, 四川 成都610041;
    2. 西华大学 文学与新闻传播学院, 四川 成都 610039;
    3. 四川大学 体育学院, 四川 成都 610065
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-31 发布日期:2025-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 贠琰,博士,副教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向:体育历史与文化、体育考古学;E-mail:83518137@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:常显玲,在读博士研究生,研究方向:人类学与民族传统体育,体育史,体育文化传播;E-mail:976647851@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“当代中国体育思想研究”(19ATY012);四川省哲学社会科学规划项目“凉山彝族地区传统射箭文化的挖掘整理与传承发展研究”(SC22B130)。

The Paradigm Writes Back: Cultural Reflection and Contemporary Enlightenment of Kyudo

CHANG Xianling1, CHEN Yushi2, YUN Yan3   

  1. 1. School of Wushu, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041;
    2. School of Literature, Journalism & Communication, Xihua University, Chengdu Sichuan 610039;
    3. School of Physical Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610065
  • Received:2024-10-31 Published:2025-04-28

摘要: 长期以来,风靡世界的日本弓道被认为是集传统性、美学性、体育性、密契性于一体的东方文化典范。然而,文章结合历史实证研究与马克思主义文化批评理论对日本弓道的存在基础进行全盘反思,认为:(1)弓道并非恒定的传统,而是被明治精英发明的传统。它裹挟了强烈的“民族圣像化”思潮,联姻了“东方主义”与“西方主义”策略;(2)弓道之所以成为具有国际性影响的文化现象,缘于:“单向度时代”对精神疗愈剂的需要;神秘主义者与文化嬉皮士的鼓噪;后福特时代激进的符号生产行为。鉴于现代弓道的一元化叙事早已在反历史的激进角色中背离了本国乃至亚洲射艺多元化的文化传统,唯有“逆写典范”,重新唤醒亚洲射艺“主体的多元性”与“输出的广泛性”的真正传统,方能够在多元、包容、平等、交流的去中心化叙事中真正促进人类的理解与和平。

关键词: 日本弓道, 文化批评, 资本主义, 去熟悉化

Abstract: Kyudo, as an art of archery popular in the world, has been regarded as a typical example of Eastern culture that integrates tradition, aesthetics, sportsmanship, and mysticism. However, this paper combines historical empirical research with Marxist cultural criticism theory to thoroughly reflect on the foundation of Kyudo, arguing that: (1) Kyudo is not a constant tradition but an invention of the Meiji elites. It carries the strong ideology of “national iconization” and combines the strategies of “Orientalism” and “Occidentalism”; (2) The reason why Kyudo has become a culturally influential phenomenon internationally includes the need for spiritual healing in the “one-dimensional age”, the clamor of mystics and cultural hippies, and the radical symbolic production behavior in the post-Fordist era. Given that the monolithic narrative of modern Kyudo has long deviated from the diverse cultural traditions of archery in Japan and Asia in its anti-historical radical role, only by “reversely writing the paradigm” to reawaken the true traditions of the “subjective multiplicity” and “extensive dissemination” of Asian archery can we truly promote human understanding and peace in a decentralized narrative of diversity, inclusiveness, equality, and exchange.

Key words: Japanese Kyudo, cultural criticism, capitalism, defamiliarization

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发