主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

Journal of Chengdu Sport University ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 28-33.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of World Anti-Doping Agency versus Sun Yang & Fédération Internationale de Natation

JIANG Xi   

  1. Institute of Sports Law, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201701
  • Received:2020-05-18 Revised:2021-01-23 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-26

Abstract: 22 December 2020,the Swiss Federal Supreme Court approved the request by the Chinese swimmer Sun Yang for revision of the arbitral award of the Courtof Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne on the grounds of the bias of one of the arbitrators of the CAS. As a result, WADA versus Sun Yang & FINA caseonce again caused widespread concern.The case involved many aspects of anti-doping such as sample collection procedures, protection of athletes' rights, and anti-doping dispute resolution etc. The article uses the methods of literature review, comparative study, and case analysis to firstly sort out the facts and Arbitral Award in the WADA versus Sun yang & FINA case.?Secondly, the ruling of the case is analyzed from seven aspects: ruling ideas, application of law, following precedent, principle of proportionality, impartiality of DCO, and intensity of sanctions.Finally, the article analyzes the enlightenment from “WADA versus Sun yang & FINA” to the construction of the rule of law in sports in China.

Key words: sports law, anti-doping, sports arbitration, CAS

CLC Number: