主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

Journal of Chengdu Sport University ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 93-99.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2017.04.014

• SPORTS SCIENCE OF HUMAN BODY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Impact of High-intensity Interval Trainingversus Moderate-intensity Continuous Trainingon Body Composition in Overweight and Obese Adults: a Meta-analysis

ZHAO Guanggao1, HONG Xiong2, SU Liqiang3, ZHANG Lin4,5, ZHU Zheng5, YANG Qin5, SUN Shunli5, QUAN Minghui5   

  1. 1. Department of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330031;
    2. Sports College of Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330022;
    3. Division of Physical Education, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang Jiangxi 330004;
    4. School of Physical education, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu Henan 476000;
    5. Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438
  • Received:2017-02-19 Online:2017-07-15 Published:2017-07-20

Abstract: Objective: To determine the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on body mass and body fat percentage in overweight and obese adults, in comparison with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched for randomized controlled trial (RCT) or clinical controlled trial (CCT) comparing the effect of HIIT and MICT on body mass and fat percentage in overweight and obese adults. The risk of bias assessment was performed for each of the included studies. The meta-analysis was performed by using STATA 13.1. Results: Ten studies, including 119 participants in HIIT and 114 participants in MICT, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference between HIIT and MICT was observed for body mass (WMD=-0.18,95% CI:-1.03~0.66,P=0.67) and fat percentage (WMD=-0.38, 95% CI: -1.02~0.27, P=0.25). However, a significant reduction in body mass following HIIT compared with MICT was observed in subgroups "48 times" (WMD=-1.51,95% CI:-2.73~-0.29,P=0.016), while marginally significant reduction in fat% following HIIT compared with MICT was observed in subgroups "12 weeks" (WMD =-0.73, 95% CI: -1.49~0.03, P=0.061) and "48 times" (WMD=-1.14,95% CI:-2.43~0.15,P=0.084). Conclusion: The effects of HIIT and MICT

Key words: High-intensity Interval Training, Moderate-intensity Continuous Training, Overweight, Obesity, Body Fat Percentage, meta-analysis

CLC Number: