主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 86-92.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.03.014

• 体育产业与体育伦理 • 上一篇    下一篇

体育裁判辅助技术的伦理风险与消解路径——基于图像技术现象学的考察

张琪   

  1. 上海体育学院休闲学院,上海 200438
  • 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-20
  • 作者简介:张琪,博士,讲师,研究方向:体育哲学、裁判哲学,E-mail:520180758@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市晨光计划资助项目“裁判员培养体系的中国实践与域外经验”(18CG60);上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目“学校体育思政体系构建研究”。

The Ethical Risks and Solutions of Referee Decision-making Aid Technology ——A Study Based on Image Technology Phenomenology

ZHANG Qi   

  1. School of Leisure Sport, Shanghai University of Sports, Shanghai 200438
  • Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-20

摘要: 基于STS研究和图像技术现象学的理论,使用文献资料、案例研究等方法,研究了裁判辅助技术的本质问题,通过梳理裁判辅助技术的兴起动因和伦理风险,提出了应对问题的消解路径。研究认为,人与机器共生的时空条件下,人仍然具有作出终局判断的法理和伦理基础。贸然使用机器替代人工执裁,将会剔除执裁工作和竞赛活动的具身属性,进而将体育变成“与或判断”的逻辑游戏。裁判辅助技术的运用带来了5类伦理冲突,主要包括:具身与技术感知能力的冲突、程序公平与结果公平的冲突、裁判责任与执裁能力的冲突、事实公平与人造公平的冲突、介入需求与技术可行的冲突。为了妥善应对技术介入带来的风险,研究建议:重释当代竞赛公平理念、重构竞赛利益的平衡关系、政治手段干预技术的使用。

关键词: 裁判, 辅助技术, 技术现象学, 公平, 伦理, 竞赛

Abstract: Using the methods of literature review, case study and depth interview, this paper studies,from the perspective of STS and image technology phenomenology, the nature of refereedecision-making aid technology, and puts froward solutions to the ethical risks based on an analysis of the causes for the increasing use of referee decision-making aid technology. It is believed that under the condition of space-timesymbiosis between humans and machines, humans still have the legal and ethical basis for making final judgments. The hasty use of machines to replace human refereeing will eliminate the physical attributes of refereeing work and competition activities, thus turning sports into a logical game of "false-true judgment". The use of referee decision-makingaid technology has brought about five types of ethical conflictsincluding: conflict between physical and technical perception, conflict between procedural fairness and result fairness, conflict between referee responsibility and enforcement ability, conflict between factual fairness and artificial fairness, and conflict between intervention requirements and technical feasibility. In order to properly deal with the risks brought about by technological intervention, the paper suggests: reinterpreting the concept of contemporary competition fairness, reconstructing the balance of competition interests, and using interveningtechnology by political means.

Key words: referee, decision-making aid technology, image technology phenomenology, fairness, ethics, competition

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发