主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 77-83.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.04.016

• 体育人文社会学:体育素养 • 上一篇    下一篇

论“身体素养”和“体育与健康学科/课程核心素养”的区别与联系

尹志华1,2, 刘艳3, 孙铭珠4, 徐丽萍1, 郭振2, 刘波2   

  1. 1.华东师范大学 体育与健康学院,上海 200241;
    2.清华大学 体育学博士后流动站,北京 100084;
    3.上海市闵行区江川路小学 体育组,上海 200240;
    4.上海工程技术大学 体育教学部,上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-05 修回日期:2022-04-03 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-08-03
  • 作者简介:尹志华,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,在站博士后,研究方向:体育教师教育理论与实践。E-mail:yzhkj86888@sina.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期资助一般项目“体育素养国际比较研究”(21FTYB006);国家社会科学基金青年项目“体育教师发展核心素养研究”(16CTY013);中国体育科学学会“高校体育与健康教育课程建设专项课题”重点项目“高校体育教师专业标准体系构建研究”(2021001);中国教育学会教育科研体育与卫生专项一般课题“新时代体育教师师德师风评价指标体系构建研究”(2020TY093117ZB)。

Difference and Connection between "Physical Literacy" and "Subject/Curriculum Key Competencies of Physical Education and Health"

YIN Zhihua1,2, LIU Yan3, SUN Mingzhu4, XU Liping1, GUO Zhen2, LIU Bo2   

  1. 1. College of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241;
    2. Postdoctoral Mobile Station of Physical Education,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084;
    3. Shanghai Minhang Jiangchuan Road Elementary School,Physical Education Department,Shanghai 200240;
    4. Department of Physical Education Teaching,Shanghai University of Engineering Science,Shanghai 201620
  • Received:2021-07-05 Revised:2022-04-03 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-08-03

摘要: 受国际发展趋势和国家政策影响,近年来我国学术界对体育相关的素养引起了高度关注,但“身体素养”和“体育与健康学科/课程核心素养”两类概念的出现引起了误解和混乱。论文对“身体素养”和“体育与健康学科/课程核心素养”进行了区分,二者区别体现在逻辑起点、涉及范围、培养路径和评价指向不同;联系体现在有着相同的理论基础、目标指向、构成特性和达成载体。为了更好地推动素养导向的体育改革,建议今后应在顶层设计层面理清二者区别,避免冲突与误解;设计指向不同类型素养的具体项目,促进素养达成;依据不同类型素养特性,发挥各自独特作用。

关键词: 身体素养, 体育与健康学科/课程核心素养, 体育改革, 课程标准

Abstract: In recent years, under the influence of both the development trend in foreign countries and national policies, the academic circles in China have paid close attention to sports related literacy, but the emergence of the concepts of "physical literacy" and "subject/curriculum key competencies of physical education and health" has caused misunderstanding and confusion. This paper makes a distinction between the two concepts, pointing out that the difference between them lies in their divergence in logical starting point, research scope, training path and evaluation direction; the connection lies in their same theoretical basis, goal direction, composition characteristics and achievement carrier. In order to better promote the literacy-oriented sports reform, it is suggested that the difference between the two should be clarified at the top-level design in the future so as to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings; specific projects targeted at different types of literacy should be designed to promote the attainment of literacy; and different types of literacy should play unique roles according to their characteristics.

Key words: physical literacy, subject/curriculum key competencies of physical education and health, sports reform, curriculum standards


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发