康益豪, 林志义, 杨海晨. 超越虚拟与现实的二元对立:线上体育现象的网络民族志研究实践与方法论反思[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2025, 51(5): 149-156. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.05.15
引用本文: 康益豪, 林志义, 杨海晨. 超越虚拟与现实的二元对立:线上体育现象的网络民族志研究实践与方法论反思[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2025, 51(5): 149-156. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.05.15
KANG Yihao, LIN Zhiyi, YANG Haichen. Transcending the Binary Opposition Between Virtuality and Reality: A Netnographic Study of Online Sports Phenomena and Methodological Reflections[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2025, 51(5): 149-156. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.05.15
Citation: KANG Yihao, LIN Zhiyi, YANG Haichen. Transcending the Binary Opposition Between Virtuality and Reality: A Netnographic Study of Online Sports Phenomena and Methodological Reflections[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2025, 51(5): 149-156. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2025.05.15

超越虚拟与现实的二元对立:线上体育现象的网络民族志研究实践与方法论反思

Transcending the Binary Opposition Between Virtuality and Reality: A Netnographic Study of Online Sports Phenomena and Methodological Reflections

  • 摘要: 网络民族志的研究该不该从线上延伸至线下?学界对此存在纷争。仅限于“线上世界”的网络民族志研究理念常被用来研究线上体育现象。运用该理念对“线上体育迷群冲突”的网络民族志研究发现,这一理念存在缺陷。这缘于线上体育现象既会与线下行为相互影响,产生虚实结合性,又会与线下行为产生一定张力,表征出虚拟差异性。由此,为化解方法纷争与深入研究线上体育现象提出:摒弃线上线下二元棱镜视角的钳制,秉持线上和线下有机结合的网络民族志研究理念,展开团队协作式的网络民族志研究;超越关于网络民族志的方法争论,秉持“块茎思维”,尝试运用多点民族志或线索民族志。

     

    Abstract: Whether netnographic research should extend from online to offline contexts remains a contentious issue in academia. The approach confined solely to the “online world” has often been employed to study online sports phenomena. However, a netnographic investigation into “online sports fan conflicts” reveals limitations in this perspective. This is because online sports phenomena not only interact with offline behaviors, creating a virtual-real integration, but also exhibit certain tensions with offline actions, highlighting a virtual distinctiveness. Consequently, to address methodological disputes and facilitate deeper research into online sports phenomena, it is proposed that researchers abandon the constraints of the online-offline binary prism, adopt a netnographic approach that organically integrates both domains, and engage in collaborative team-based netnographic studies. Furthermore, moving beyond methodological debates about netnography is essential to embrace a “rhizomatic mindset” and explore the application of multi-sited ethnography or trace ethnography.

     

/

返回文章
返回