主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 49-54.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2019.02.008

• 体育人文社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

从体育管理到体育治理的内在困境与路径选择

胥万兵   

  1. 成都体育学院,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-10 出版日期:2019-03-15 发布日期:2019-04-03
  • 作者简介:胥万兵,副研究员,研究方向:体育管理,Email:xuwanbing@cdsu.edu.cn。

The Internal Predicament and Path Selection from Sports Management to Sports Governance

XU Wanbing   

  1. Chengdu Sports University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041
  • Received:2018-09-10 Online:2019-03-15 Published:2019-04-03

摘要: 体育管理是计划经济时代的产物,体育治理则是市场经济推动下的行政体系的自我改革。相对而言体育管理与体育治理的核心差异是行政主体的差异、价值目标的差异、运行手段的差异。目前体育治理的内在困境主要体现为:一元主体向多元主体的转变的结构性困境;管理思维向治理理念迁移的认知性困境;垂直管理向横向协同变更的操作性困境。从体育管理到体育治理体现了我国不同时期的管理范式,这一走向不仅是大势所趋,而且也是历史发展的必然,是社会生产关系适应社会生产力发展的一种客观体现。

关键词: 体育管理, 体育治理, 内在困境

Abstract: Sports management is a practice in the era of planned economy while sport governance is the self-reform of administrative system driven by market economy. Relatively speaking, the core difference between sports management and sports governance is reflected in administrative subject, value target, and operation means. Currently, sport governance faces such internal predicaments as structural predicament in terms of the transformation from unary subject to multiple subjects, cognitive predicament in terms of the transition from management thinking to concepts of governance, and operational predicament in terms of the change from vertical management to horizontal synergy. The change from sports management to sports governance reflects China's management paradigms in different periods. This trend is irresistible and is an inevitable outcome of historical development. It objectively reflects that social productive relations have to adapt to the development of social productivity.

Key words: sports management, sports governance, internal predicament

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发