董金鑫. 论职业足球劳动合同单方解除争议解决的比较法研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.03.009
引用本文: 董金鑫. 论职业足球劳动合同单方解除争议解决的比较法研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.03.009
DONG Jinxin. On the Unilateral Termination of Professional Football Labor Contract[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.03.009
Citation: DONG Jinxin. On the Unilateral Termination of Professional Football Labor Contract[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.03.009

论职业足球劳动合同单方解除争议解决的比较法研究

On the Unilateral Termination of Professional Football Labor Contract

  • 摘要: 根据国际足联的规定,单方解除职业足球劳动合同需要存在正当理由。综合足球行业的实践,球员单方解除职业足球劳动合同集中发生于俱乐部的不予注册、工资的过度扣除、训练条件的不足等情形,而俱乐部单方解除职业足球劳动合同则包括球员伤病、表现欠佳、擅自离队或拒绝归队以及摄取禁用物质等情形。这些做法与我国现行劳动立法预先设置的法定解除情形存有不同。未来我国职业足球劳动合同单方解除争议的解决宜在借鉴国际体育仲裁法理的基础上,通过体育仲裁庭个案归纳的方式将解除的正当理由类型化,来妥善处理我国法和足球行业规则在该领域的适用冲突。

     

    Abstract: The unilateral termination of professional football labor contract requires a just cause according to the practical needs of football development and the provisions of FIFA. Based on the practice of football industry, the unilateral termination of professional football labor contract by football players is mainly caused by club's failure in player registration, excessive deduction of players' salary and lack of training conditions, while the reasons for the unilateral termination of labor contract by clubs include football players' injuries and illnesses, their poor performances, leaving the team without permission or refusal to return to the team, and ingestion of prohibited substances. Due to the differences in thinking pattern and methodology, there is a clear distinction between this practice and the pre-arranged statutory termination in existing labor legislations in China. Thus in the future, the settlement of disputes over unilateral termination of professional football labor contract in China should be resolved by classifying the just causes of termination into different types through case induction by the sports arbitration panel by referring to the jurisprudence of international sports arbitration, so as to properly resolve the conflict between the application of state law and the practice of football industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回