体育教学实验干预的执行效度:定义、概念框架与测评体系

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.03.010

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 66-71.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.03.010

体育教学实验干预的执行效度:定义、概念框架与测评体系

金晶¹, 李卫东², 马莲³, 唐炎³

1.南京林业大学,江苏南京 210037;
2.俄亥俄州立大学,俄亥俄哥伦布 43210;
3.上海体育学院,上海 200438

收稿日期:2020-05-03 修回日期:2021-02-20 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-06-18
通讯作者: 李卫东,教授,博士生导师,美国俄亥俄州立大学人体科学系终身教授,研究方向:课程与教学、肥胖儿童社会歧视及处理对策、学生心理与健康行为。E-mail:li.832@osu.edu。
作者简介:金晶,副教授,研究方向:体育课程,学生心理健康。E-mail:jinjing1974@njfu.edu.cn。

Fidelity of Implementation in Intervention Research in Physical Education: Definition, Conceptual Framework, and Measurement

JIN Jing¹, LI Weidong², MA Lian³, TANG Yan³

1. Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037 China;
2. Department of Human Sciences, College of Education and Human Ecology, the Ohio State University, Columbus OH 43210 USA;
3. Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai200438 China

Received:2020-05-03 Revised:2021-02-20 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前,我国发表的体育教学实验干预研究文章鲜有报道实验干预执行的有效度数据。实验干预执行有效度是指在实验过程中,实验干预按照原定设计的内容计划执行的程度,是评估实验结果的必要因素。若干预实验研究缺乏执行有效度,实验的结果数据便会缺乏解释力度,大大削弱了体育教学研究的科学严谨性。本文通过介绍国外对实验干预执行有效度的定义以及五个部分的概念框架,探讨了实验研究对干预执行有效度进行测量和评价的重要性,提供了关于实验干预执行有效度测量工具的详细案例,并创建了测量与评价体系,旨在提高我国体育教学实验干预研究的科学严谨性。

关键词: 体育教育, 实验干预研究, 教学效果

Abstract: Researchers who published experimental studies in Chinese journals seldom report any data related to fidelity of implementation of program interventions. For intervention studies without any fidelity of implementation data, there lacks power to provide explanations to the findings. This greatly weakens the scientific and rigorous nature of intervention research in the field. This paper introduces the definition of fidelity of implementation and its 5-component conceptual framework, discuss the critical importance of measuring and evaluating fidelity of implementation, provide examples of assessing fidelity of implementation in detail, and develop a checklist to measure fidelity of implementation, with a goal of improving scientific rigor of intervention research in physical education in China.

Key words: physical education, experimental studies, teaching effectiveness

中图分类号:

G807

金晶, 李卫东, 马莲, 唐炎. 体育教学实验干预的执行效度:定义、概念框架与测评体系[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(3): 66-71.

JIN Jing, LI Weidong, MA Lian, TANG Yan. Fidelity of Implementation in Intervention Research in Physical Education: Definition, Conceptual Framework, and Measurement[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2021, 47(3): 66-71.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.03.010

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V47/I3/66

参考文献

[1] LI W, XIE X, LI Y, et al. Twenty years of intervention research in school physical education in the JTPE and RQES[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, In press.
[2] MOWBRAY C T, HOLTER M C, TEAGUE G B, et al. Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation[J]. American Journal of Evaluation, 2003, 24:315-340.
[3] DUSENBURY L, BRANNIGAN R, FALCO M, et al. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings[J]. Health Education Research Theory and Practice, 2003, 18:237-256.
[4] O'DONNELL C L. Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2008, 78:33-84.
[5] SUMMERFELT W M. Program strength and fidelity in evaluation[J]. Applied Developmental Science, 2003, 7(2):55-61.
[6] DURLAK J A, DUPRE E P. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on programs outcomes and the factors affecting implementation[J]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2008, 41:327-350.
[7] BELLG A J, BORRELLI B, RESNICK B, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium[J]. Health Psychology, 2004, 23(5):443-451.
[8] BORRELLI B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public clinical trials[J]. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 2011, 71:s52-s63.
[9] SANETTI L M H, DOBEY L M, GRITTER K L. Treatment integrity of interventions with children in the Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions from 1999 to 2009[J]. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2012, 14(1):29-46.
[10] BRUCKENTHAL P, BRODERTICK J E. Assessing treatment fidelity in pilot studies assist in designing clinical trials: An illustration from a nurse practitioner community-based intervention for pain[J]. Advances in Nursing Science, 2007, 30: E72-84.
[11] ESCARTI A, LLOPIS-Goig R, WRIGHT P M. Assessing the implementation fidelity of a school-based teaching personal and social responsibility program in physical education and other subject areas[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2018, 37:12-23.
[12] HASTIE P A, CASEY A. Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2014, 33:422-431.
[13] KIRK D. Educational value and models-based practice in physical education[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2013, 45: 973-986.
[14] KLOEPPEL T, KULINNA H P, STYLIANOU M, et al. Teacher fidelity to one physical education curricular model[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2013, 32: 186-204.
[15] METZLER M M. Instructional models for physical education (3rd ed.)[M]. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway, 2011.
[16] KO B, WALLHEAD T, WARD P. Chapter 4: Professional development workshops: What do teachers learn and use?[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2006, 25:397-412.
[17] LOFIIN J W. Relationship between teacher fidelity and physical education student outcomes[J]. Physical Educator, 2015, 72:359-383.
[18] ZHU X, ENNIS C D, & CHEN, A. Implementation challenges for a constructivist physical education curriculum[J]. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 2011, 16(1):83-99.
[19] ROGERS E. Diffusion of innovations[M]. New York: Free Press, 2003.
[20] MONCHER F J, PRINZ F J. Treatment fidelity in outcome studies[J]. Clinical Psychology Review, 1991, 11:247-266.
[21] DANE A V, SCHNEIDER B H. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?[J]. Clinical Psychology Review, 1998, 18:23-45.
[22] LICHSTEIN K L, RIEDEL B W, Grieve R. Fair tests of clinical trials: A treatment implementation model[J]. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1994, 16:1-29.
[23] MIHALIC S. The importance of implementation fidelity[J]. Emotional & Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 2004, 4:83-86, 99-105.
[24] RESNICK B, BELLG A J, Borrelli B, et al. Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC studies: Where we are and where we need to go[J]. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2005, 29:46-54.
[25] BERMAN P, MCLAUGHLIN M W. Implementation of educational innovation[J]. Educational Forum, 1976, 40:345-370.
[26] SCHEIRER M A, REZMOVIC E L. Measuring the degree of program implementation: A methodological review[J]. Evaluation Review, 1983, 7:599-633.
[27] WARD P, KIM I, KO B, et al. Effects of improving teachers' content knowledge on teaching and learning in physical education[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2015, 86:130-139.
[28] HASTIE P. Skill and tactical development during a sport education season[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998, 69:368-379.
[29] LI W, MA L, XIANG P, TANG Y. A review of fidelity of implementation in intervention research published in the JTPE and RQES [J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, In press.

体育教学实验干预的执行效度:定义、概念框架与测评体系

Fidelity of Implementation in Intervention Research in Physical Education: Definition, Conceptual Framework, and Measurement

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马杰华. 清末四川新式高等体育教育研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(3): 118-126.
[2]	覃立, 黎吉权. “双减”政策下体育教育公平审思:意义解读、问题防范与发展路向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 120-126.
[3]	孙科, 杨帆, 朱天宇, 樊菁. 论中国式体育教育现代化[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 38-46.
[4]	张晓林, 关清文, 舒为平. 联合国教科文组织优质体育教育政策的演进历程、特征及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 97-105.
[5]	杨益东. 高校体育课程思政的生成逻辑、价值意蕴与实践向度[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 106-112.
[6]	吴相雷, 陶玉流, 李卫东, 彭庆文, 李奕霖, 叶巍. 学科内容知识视域下我国体育教育专业运动技术技能课程教学改革路径研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 105-111.
[7]	尹志华, 郭明明, 贾晨昱, 徐艳贤, 李晨曦. 人工智能助推体育教育发展的需求机理、关键维度与实现方略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 73-81.
[8]	李静. 第二次工业革命时期英国女子体育教育的兴起与特征研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(5): 124-130.
[9]	张丽军,孙有平. 走向主动健康:后疫情时代运动健康教育与大数据融合发展研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 47-52.
[10]	张连磊, 梁诚, 王健. 中国近代体育教育场域中女子身体生成考察[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(2): 50-55.
[11]	董国永, 卓贞梅, 李健, 王健. 新加坡体育教育专业师范生教育实习体系研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(6): 74-81.
[12]	李世宏. 民国时期“体育教育”一词的出现及其流变研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(3): 44-51.
[13]	李卫东, 沈鹤军, 朱乔. 国内外体育素养文献分析与对比研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(1): 41-49.
[14]	尹志华, 汪晓赞, 孙铭珠. 基于标准的职前体育教师质量评估认证体系开发研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(2): 85-92.
[15]	季浏. 聚焦前沿热点问题、关注体育教育发展、共探学生成长未来——2019国际体育课程与教学大会综述[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(5): 27-34.