美国粗大动作发展测试(TGMD)解析与启示

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.010

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 58-64.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.010

美国粗大动作发展测试(TGMD)解析与启示

李博¹, 刁玉翠², 李静², 洪金涛³, 孙建刚⁴, 刘阳^1,5

1.上海体育学院体育教育训练学院,上海 200438;
2.山东师范大学体育学院,山东济南 250358;
3.上海体育科学研究所(上海市反兴奋剂中心),上海 200030;
4.皖西学院体育学院,安徽六安 237012;
5.上海市学生体质健康研究中心,上海 200438

收稿日期:2019-10-29 修回日期:2020-09-24 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-26
通讯作者: 刘阳,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:运动与健康促进。E-mail:docliuyang@hotmail.com。
作者简介:李博,博士研究生,研究方向:学校体育学。E-mail:wangqiulibo@163.com。
基金资助:
国家社科基金“体育活动对幼儿基本动作技能及体质健康促进的实证研究”(19BTY077)。

Analysis and Enlightenment of American Test of Gross Motor Development

LI Bo¹, DIAO Yucui², LI Jing², HONG Jintao³, SUN Jiangang⁴, LIU Yang^1,5

1. School of Physical Education and Sport Training, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438;
2. School of Physical Education, Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong 250358;
3. Shanghai Research Institute of Sports Science (Shanghai Anti-Doping Agency), Shanghai 200030;
4. School of Physical Education,West Anhui University, Luan Anhui 237012;
5. Shanghai Research Center for Physical Fitness and Health of Children and Adolescents, Shanghai 200438

Received:2019-10-29 Revised:2020-09-24 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于测评体系应用的视角对美国粗大动作发展测试(Test of Gross Motor Development,TGMD)的产生发展背景、测量和评价系统、信效度、优缺点以及应用情况等方面开展研究,旨在促进我国儿童动作发展研究的开展。结果显示:TGMD的产生和发展具有特定的社会和学术背景;经过30年的发展,TGMD系列已经成为当前世界上应用最广泛的儿童粗大动作技能测评工具,被广泛应用的原因在于该测评体系的高度标准化。但TGMD存在着诸如指标适用性、过程性评价弊端等缺点,这需要引起使用者们的注意。文章通过对TGMD系列的解读分析,结合该测试目前在我国的应用现状,从思路和方法上提出对我国儿童动作发展研究的启示。

关键词: 粗大动作发展测试, 经典测量理论, 常模参照评价, 儿童, 终身体育, 基本运动技能

Abstract: Based on the perspective of applying evaluation systems, this paper conducted a research on the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) in the United States, including its development background, measurement and evaluation system, reliability, advantages and disadvantages, and application to promote the research on children's movement developmentin China. The results show that the origin and development of TGMD has a specific social and academic background; after 30 years of development, the TGMD series has become the most widely used assessment tool for children's gross motor skills in the world for it has been highly standardized. While TGMD has shortcomings in indicator applicabilityand process evaluation, which deserve users' attention.By interpreting the TGMD series and the Chinese translation of the latest version of the scoring table, this present paper, with reference to its application situation in China, makes some enlightenment for the study on children's movement development in China interms of both perspective and method.

Key words: Test of Gross Motor Development(TGMD), Classical Test Theory, Norm-referenced Test, children, lifelong sports, fundamental movement/motor skill

中图分类号:

G804.49

李博, 刁玉翠, 李静, 洪金涛, 孙建刚, 刘阳. 美国粗大动作发展测试(TGMD)解析与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(2): 58-64.

LI Bo, DIAO Yucui, LI Jing, HONG Jintao, SUN Jiangang, LIU Yang. Analysis and Enlightenment of American Test of Gross Motor Development[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2021, 47(2): 58-64.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.010

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V47/I2/58

参考文献

[1] BARNETT L M, STODDEN D, COHEN K E, et al. Fundamental movement skills: An important focus[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2016, 35(3): 219-225.
[2] GREGPAYNE,耿培新,梁国立.人类动作发展概论[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2008:194-197.
[3] 胡小清,唐炎,刘阳,等.近30年美国中小学体育教育发展现状及启示——基于《美国学校体育教育发展现状报告》的文本分析[J].上海体育学院学报,2018,42(6):86-101.
[4] 尹晓峰, 刘志民.德国儿童与青少年健康访查调研项目(KiGGS)的构建与启示[J]. 中国体育科技,2017, 53(5): 12-21.
[5] 辛飞, 蔡玉军, 鲍冉,等. 国外幼儿基本动作技能干预研究系统评述[J]. 体育科学,2019, 39(2): 83-96.
[6] 李博,刘阳,陈思同,等.儿童青少年基本运动技能测评工具研究及启示[J].上海体育学院学报,2018, 42(3): 12-20.
[7] 马瑞, 宋珩. 基本运动技能发展对儿童身体活动与健康的影响[J]. 体育科学, 2017, 37(4): 54-61.
[8] 王政淞, 李红娟, 张柳. 动作能力对儿童青少年体力活动与健康促进的重要意义——基于动作能力研究模型的综述分析[J]. 体育科学,2017,37(11): 74-82.
[9] BEATON D E, BOMBARDIER C, GUILLEMIN F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(24): 3186-91.
[10] ULRICH A D. Introduction to the special section: Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3[J]. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1): 1-4.
[11] EDWARDS L, BRYANT A, KEEGAN R, et al. Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review[J]. Sports Med, 2016,47(1):113-126.
[12] 王兴泽, 黄永飞, 谢东北, 等. 动作发展序列理论及体育教学案例分析[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2014, 37(3): 98-106.
[13] CLARK J E, WHITALL J. Developmental coordination disorder: function, participation, and assessment[J]. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2011, 32(4): 1243-4.
[14] CAIRNEY J, HAY J A, VELDHUIZEN S, et al. Developmental coordination disorder, sex, and activity deficit over time: a longitudinal analysis of participation trajectories in children with and without coordination difficulties[J]. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2010, 52(3): 67-72.
[15] LINDE B W, VAN DER, NETTEN J J, VAN, OTTEN E, et al. A systematic review of instruments for assessment of capacity in activities of daily living in children with developmental co-ordination disorder[J]. Child Care Health & Development, 2015, 41(1): 23-34.
[16] DOWNEY R, RAPPORT M J. Motor activity in children with autism: a review of current literature[J]. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2012, 24(1): 2-20.
[17] SIMONS J, DALY D, THEODOROU F, et al. Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 in 7-10-year-old Flemish children with intellectual disability[J]. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly Apaq, 2008, 25(1): 71-82.
[18] AMANDA H, PETER H, ANDERS B, et al. A classical test theory evaluation of the Sleep Condition Indicator accounting for the ordinal nature of item response data[J]. PloS one, 2019, 14(3).1-13.
[19] EZZELLE L, MOUTOUX M. Critical Review of the Test of Gross Motor Development[J]. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 2009, 12(4): 73-87.
[20] 刁玉翠, 董翠香, 李静. 大肌肉动作发展测验上海市常模的建立[J]. 中国体育科技, 2018, 54(2):99-105.
[21] BARDID F, HUYBEN F, LENOIR M, et al. Assessing fundamental motor skills in Belgian children aged 3-8 years highlights differences to US reference sample[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2016, 105(6): 281-290.
[22] EYRE E L J, WALKER L J, DUNCAN M J. Fundamental movement skills of children living in england: The role of ethnicity and native english language[J]. Percept Mot Skills, 2018, 125(1): 5-20.
[23] WEBSTER E K, ULRICH D A. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3[J]. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 2017, (5): 45-58.
[24] CAPIO C M, EGUIA K F, SIMONS J. Test of gross motor development-2 for Filipino children with intellectual disability: validity and reliability[J]. J Sports Sci, 2016, 34(1): 10-17.
[25] 张力为. 信度的正用与误用[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2002, 25(3): 64-66.
[26] MAENG H, WEBSTER E K, PITCHFORD E A, et al. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities of the TGMD-3 Among Experienced TGMD-2 Raters[J]. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly Apaq, 2017, 34(4): 1-14.
[27] 刁玉翠, 董翠香, 李静. 大肌肉动作发展测验上海市常模的建立[J]. 中国体育科技, 2018, 54(2): 99-105.
[28] 张力为. 效度的正用与误用[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2002, 25(4): 493-495.
[29] 李静, 马红霞. 儿童动作发展测试(TGMD-2)信度和效度的研究[J]. 体育学刊, 2007, 14(3): 37-40.
[30] KIM C I, LEE K Y. The relationship between fundamental movement skills and body mass index in Korean preschool children[J]. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2016, 24(6): 928-935.
[31] MAYSON T A, HARRIS S R, BACHMAN C L. Gross motor development of asian and european children on four motor assessments: a literature review[J]. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2007, 19(2): 148-153.
[32] WARD B, THORNTON A, LAY B, et al. Can proficiency criteria be accurately identified during real-time fundamental movement skill assessment?[J]. Research Quarterly for Exercise And Sport, 2019,91(1):64-72.
[33] MAGISTRO D, PIUMATTI G, CARLEVARO F, et al. Measurement invariance of TGMD-3 in children with and without mental and behavioral disorders[J]. Psychological Assessment, 2018, 30(11):1421-1429.
[34] RYAN BURNS Y F, JAMES HANNON,TIMOTHY A BRUSSEAU. Effect of a 12-week physical activity program on gross motor skills in children[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills,2017, 124(6):1121-1133.
[35] EYRE E L J, WALKER L J, DUNCAN M J. Fundamental movement skills of children living in england: The role of ethnicity and native english language[J]. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 2017, 125(1): 5-20.
[36] LEANNE A W , D M, T J. Fundamental motor skills of children in deprived areas of england: A focus on age, gender and ethnicity[J]. 2018, 5(8): 110-119.
[37] ISSARTEL J, MCGRANE B, FLETCHER R, et al. A cross-validation study of the TGMD-2: The case of an adolescent population[J]. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2017, 20(5): 475-479.
[38] 李静, 刁玉翠. 3～10岁儿童基本动作技能发展比较研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2013, 49(3): 129-132.
[39] 宁科, 邵晓军, 米青. 大肌肉动作发展量表(TGMD-2)在学前儿童中的验证性因素分析[J]. 陕西学前师范学院学报, 2016, 32(1): 65-68.
[40] 刁玉翠, 李静. 济南市3～10岁儿童运动技能比较研究[J]. 山东体育科技, 2013, 35(3): 114-118.
[41] 李静. 中美3-10岁儿童移动性动作发展比较与研究[J]. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(2): 162-164.
[42] 袁鑫, 王丽岩, 王丽静. 沈阳7～8岁儿童大肌肉群动作发展与动作能力感知的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2019, 40(5): 738-741.
[43] 辛飞, 蔡玉军, 施铭炘,等.澳门6～10岁儿童基本动作技能与身体活动的关系[J]. 体育学刊,2019, 26(4):129-134.
[44] 李静, 刁玉翠, 孙梦梦, 等. 3～5岁幼儿基本动作技能与体能的关系研究[J]. 中国体育科技,2019, 55(6).52-58.
[45] 王欢,胡水清,李一辰,等.学前儿童动作技能与身体素质水平的典型相关分析[J].中国体育科技,2019, 55(6): 46-51.
[46] SUN S H, SUN H L, ZHU Y C, et al. Concurrent validity of Preschooler Gross Motor Quality Scale with Test of Gross Motor Development-2[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2011, 32(3): 1163-1168.
[47] 郭晨, 罗冬梅, 王荣辉,等. 3～6岁学龄前儿童大肌肉群动作发展评价量表的研制[J]. 体育科学, 38(10): 48-55.

美国粗大动作发展测试(TGMD)解析与启示

Analysis and Enlightenment of American Test of Gross Motor Development

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴进, 杨宇航, 李利强, 孙有平. 隐忧与消解:中国儿童青少年身体活动促进的时空社会学审视[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 9-15.
[2]	张俊杰, 刘海元, 展恩燕. 中外学生体质健康测试制度概述、比较与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 75-84.
[3]	原雅青, 王美娟, 原维佳, 刘洋. 健康促进视角下智力障碍儿童基本动作技能干预研究进展[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(6): 129-138.
[4]	李博, 刘亚男, 施利娟, 朱晓玲, 刘阳. 德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 70-75.
[5]	柯友枝, 张丹青, Grant Tomkinson, 刘阳. 儿童青少年有氧耐力变化趋势的分析及启示——基于1964—2017年的国内外研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 77-84.
[6]	蔡瑞金, 鲍红艳, 季浏. 结构化技能教学与儿童青少年运动自我概念、体育学习兴趣的关系研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(5): 104-110.
[7]	余蕾,王爱文,李阳,韩娜娜,黄晖明. COVID-19疫情防控常态化背景下儿童青少年的身体活动[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 60-66.
[8]	袁广锋, 李明达, 张水顺, 郑祥荣, 陈明祥, 何雅文. 基于社会生态学理论的美国5～12岁儿童课外身体活动综合干预的特点与启示——以美国俄亥俄州哥伦布为例[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(2): 104-109.
[9]	刘欣然, 张娟. 生命的记忆:童年消逝的文化危机与身体教育的哲学拯救[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(4): 33-38.
[10]	戴朝. 足球锻炼及停练对10～11岁儿童执行功能的影响[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(5): 109-113.
[11]	常振亚, 王树明. 客观测量的学龄前儿童体力活动、静坐行为与执行功能的关系[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 45(4): 114-120.
[12]	汪晓赞, 杨燕国, 孔琳, 童甜甜, 陈美媛. 中国儿童青少年体育健康促进发展战略研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(3): 6-12.
[13]	李博, 洪金涛, 孙建刚, 陆颖之, 刘阳. 国际儿童青少年基本运动技能研究的热点解析(1990-2019)[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(3): 26-32.
[14]	杨东亚, 罗帅呈, 毛振明. 论体育课程在大中小学的断裂与衔接(下)[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(4): 91-97.
[15]	宋秀平. “两宋”婴戏文物的“体育活动”辨析[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(3): 30-36.