基本权利与体育诚信的较量:反兴奋剂“行踪报告制度”还能走多远？

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 8-13.

基本权利与体育诚信的较量:反兴奋剂“行踪报告制度”还能走多远？

祝曦东^¹，姜世波^²

1.山东大学体育学院，山东济南250100；
2.山东大学威海法学院，山东威海264209

收稿日期:2013-02-21 修回日期:2014-01-03 出版日期:2013-06-01 发布日期:2014-01-03
作者简介:祝曦东(1974-),男,山东烟台人,讲师,主要从事体育管理学研究。通讯作者姜世波(1967-),男,教授,博士。
基金资助:
2013年国家体育总局哲学社会科学研究项目(1947SS13108)。

A Contest between Fundamental Rights and Sports Integrity:How Far "The Whereabouts Rules" in Anti-doping System going

ZHU Xi-Dong, JIANG Shi-Bo

Shandong University, Jinan Shandong, 250100

Received:2013-02-21 Revised:2014-01-03 Online:2013-06-01 Published:2014-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际反兴奋剂机构(WADA)的《反兴奋剂条例》实施后,其中的运动员行踪报告制度引起了体育界的高度争议。许多运动员、体育组织指责其侵犯了运动员的隐私权、休息权、人格尊严和行动自由等,而国际反兴奋剂机构则坚决捍卫该规则的客观需要和正当性。就司法判例来看,行踪规则的合法性和合理性都得到了承认,但体现出衡量当事人过错和程序正当性的因素,反兴奋剂机构也在作出回应并表现出完善其保护运动员隐私权的趋势。

关键词: WADA, 行踪规则, 隐私权, 体育诚信

Abstract: The whereabouts reporting system of athletes in the Anti-Doping Regulation of the International Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has ignited many controversies in sports field. Many athletes and sports organizations have accused it of violating the privacy of the athletes, the right to rest, the right of human dignity and freedom of movement, while the Anti-Doping Agencies resolutely defend the necessity and legitimacy of the rules. In review of judicial precedents, the legality and rationality of the whereabouts rules have been recognized, but the factors measuring the faults and due process are also witnessed. The Anti-Doping Agencies are responding and improving their protection of athletes' privacy.

Key words: WADA, Whereabouts Rules, privacy right, sports integrity

中图分类号:

G80-05

祝曦东，姜世波. 基本权利与体育诚信的较量:反兴奋剂“行踪报告制度”还能走多远？[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2013, 39(6): 8-13.

ZHU Xi-Dong, JIANG Shi-Bo. A Contest between Fundamental Rights and Sports Integrity:How Far "The Whereabouts Rules" in Anti-doping System going[J]. , 2013, 39(6): 8-13.