基于扎根理论的体能教练实践能力探索性研究

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.06.012

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 74-79.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.06.012

基于扎根理论的体能教练实践能力探索性研究

赵海波¹, 彭千²

1.宁夏师范学院体育学院,宁夏固原 756000;
2.北京体育大学竞技体育学院,北京100084

收稿日期:2021-06-30 修回日期:2022-09-28 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-12-01
作者简介:赵海波,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:体能训练。E-mail:15117926749@163.com。
基金资助:
宁夏哲学社会科学规划项目“宁夏全民健身与全民健康融合发展研究”(21NXBTY01)。

Exploratory Research on the Practice Ability of Strength and Conditioning Coaches Based on Grounded Theory

ZHAO Haibo¹, PENG Qian²

1. School of Physical Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan Ningxia 756000;
2. School of Athletics, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084

Received:2021-06-30 Revised:2022-09-28 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章运用程序化扎根理论研究方法,构建了中国体能教练实践能力模型。通过对24位专家一对一访谈以及结合网络留言、文本资料等获取原始材料,利用3级编码方法,获得4个主范畴、13个范畴、48个概念,继而在确定主范畴关系的基础上构建了体能教练实践能力模型,即模型由4个一级指标(实践动机、专业实践能力、一般实践能力、情景实践能力)、13个二级指标(内生实践动机、外生实践动机、专业知识、专业技能、反思与总结、人际沟通能力、促进运动员发展、协作配合能力、知识构建能力、职业道德与工作态度、科研能力、分析能力、创新能力)和48个三级指标组成。模型可为我国体能教练专业化发展提供必要参考。

关键词: 扎根理论, 体能教练, 实践能力, 运动训练, 质性研究

Abstract: Using proceduralist grounded theory research methods to construct a practice ability model for Chinese strength and conditioning coaches. The original materials were obtained through one-on-one interviews with 24 experts and the combination of online messages and text materials. Using the three-level coding method, the authors obtained 4 main categories, 13 categories, and 48 concepts and then constructed a practice ability model for strength and conditioning coaches on the basis of determining the relationship between the main categories. The model consists of 4 first-level indicators (practical motivation, professional practice ability, general practice ability, situational practice ability), 13 secondary indicators (endogenous practice motivation, exogenous practice motivation, professional knowledge, professional skills, reflection and summary, interpersonal communication skills, promotion of athlete development, collaboration and cooperation skills, knowledge building ability, professional ethics and work attitude, scientific research ability, analysis ability, innovation ability) and 48 three-level indicators. The model can provide the necessary reference for the professional development of Chinese strength and conditioning coaches.

Key words: grounded theory, strength and conditioning coaches, practice ability, athletic training, qualitative research

中图分类号:

G808.1

赵海波, 彭千. 基于扎根理论的体能教练实践能力探索性研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 74-79.

ZHAO Haibo, PENG Qian. Exploratory Research on the Practice Ability of Strength and Conditioning Coaches Based on Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(6): 74-79.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.06.012

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V48/I6/74

参考文献

[1] 袁守龙.体能训练发展趋势和数字化智能化转型[J].体育学研究,2018,1(2):77-85.
[2] 闫琪,廖婷,张雨佳.数字化体能训练的理念、进展与实践[J].体育科学,2018,38(11):3-16.
[3] 傅维利,刘磊.个体实践能力要素构成的质性研究及其教育启示[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2012,30(1):1-13.
[4] 贾旭东,衡量.扎根理论的“丛林”、过往与进路[J].科研管理,2020,41(5):151-163.
[5] DENZIN Y, LINCOLNS. Handbook of qualitative research[M]. Thousand oaks: Sage, 1994:11-12.
[6] 王璐,高鹏.扎根理论及其在管理学研究中的应用问题探讨[J].外国经济与管理,2010,32(12):10-18.
[7] JOHNSON B, CHRISTENSEN L.教育研究:定量、定性和混合方法(第四版)[M].马健生,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2019:353-354.
[8] CORBIN J M,STRAUSS A L.质性研究的基础:形成扎根理论的程序与方法[M].朱光明,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2015:30-34.
[9] DANIEL B. Interviews with some of the ASCA'S and the world's leading strength & conditioning coaches[J]. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, 2015, 23(2):87-90.
[10] TALPEY S W , SIESMAA E J . Sports Injury Prevention: The role of the strength and conditioning coach[J]. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2017, 39(3):15-19
[11] GILBERT W, MARK W B. Becoming an effective strength and conditioning coach[J]. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2014, 1(36):28-34.
[12] GILSON T A, CHOW G M, EWING M E. Using goal orientations to understand motivation in strength training[J]. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2008, 22(4):1169-1175.
[13] GALLO G J, MARCO G M D. Self-Assessment and modification of a division I strength and conditioning coachs instructional behavior[J]. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2008, 22(4):1228-1235.
[14] TOD D A, BOND K A, LAVALLEE D. Professional development themes in strength and conditioning coaches[J]. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2012, 26(3):851-860.
[15] ANDERSON A G, KNOWLES Z, GILBOURNE D. Reflective practice for sport psychologists: concepts, models, practical implications, and thoughts on dissemination[J]. The Sport Psychologist, 2004, 18(2):188-203.
[16] SZEDLAK C, SMITH M J, DAY M C, et al. Effective behaviours of strength and conditioning coaches as perceived by athletes[J]. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2015, 10(5):967-984.
[17] SPROULE J. The importance of coaching philosophy[M]. New York: Routledge, 2015:54-68.
[18] GILLHAM A, SCHOFIELD G, DOSCHER M, et al. Developing and implementing a coaching philosophy: guidance from award-winning strength and conditioning coaches[J]. International Sport Coaching Journal, 2016, 3(1):54-64.
[19] MARTINEZ, DAVID M. Study of the key determining factors for the NCAA division I head strength and conditioning coach[J]. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2004, 18(1):5-18.
[20] MEIR R, NICHOLLS A R. Applying a research ethics model to the practice of being a strength and conditioning coach[J]. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2018,40(6): 82–89.
[21] GILBERT W. Coaching better every season: a year-round system for athlete development and program success[M]. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2017:71–101.
[22] MAGNUSEN, MARSHALL J. Differences in strength and conditioning coach self-perception of leadership style behaviors at the National Basketball Association, division I-A, and division II levels[J]. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2010, 24(6):1440-1450.
[23] KRAEMER W J. Twenty years and still growing[J]. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2006, 20(1):5.

基于扎根理论的体能教练实践能力探索性研究

Exploratory Research on the Practice Ability of Strength and Conditioning Coaches Based on Grounded Theory

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭国强 , 郭月德. 中国备战巴黎奥运会的形势研判、制胜优势与应对策略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(3): 77-84.
[2]	胡昌领, 杨成波. 新时代中国运动训练理论的使命:方法论自觉[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 127-134.
[3]	陈丽, 王廷兴, 翁明嘉, 王伟. 单边肌力训练对青少年男子足球运动员专项体能的影响[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 91-96.
[4]	孙有平, 孙民康. 中国竞技体能训练基本问题反思与对策研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 135-142.
[5]	石岩. 质性研究和量化研究的差异——以体育学研究为例[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(1): 24-28.
[6]	温朋飞, 熊欢. 城市已婚已育女性参与体育健身动机及转化的质性研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 107-113.
[7]	路恒, 许贻林, 王然. 等长大腿中部拉测试在下肢肌肉力量诊断中的应用[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(1): 129-135.
[8]	金乃婧, 洪绍楠, 米靖, 赵燕鹏. 负荷管理新工具:急慢性负荷比的研究进展[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(1): 136-142.
[9]	廖永华. 重复性最大离心运动训练的交叉转移效应研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(6): 116-121.
[10]	黄谦, 崔书琴, 密思雨, 葛小雨, 张宇, 张彬, 王铖皓. 中国足球职业联赛女性裁判员职业压力研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(4): 24-32.
[11]	金成平, 姚琦, 李少丹. 新世纪中国运动训练理论发展的难点与突破点探寻[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(3): 81-85.
[12]	李海鹏, 陈小平, 何卫, 吴昊. 科技助力竞技体育:运动训练中可穿戴设备的应用与发展[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(3): 19-25.
[13]	王学彬, 郑家鲲. 中国体育智库竞争力影响因素与路径选择——基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(3): 70-77.
[14]	翁银, 李凌. 沉浸互动模型:滑雪消费心流体验机制的质性研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(2): 78-84.
[15]	杨成波. 近代运动训练科学研究范式:特征及局限[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(4): 73-78.