基于美国国家课程标准的体育素养评价指标体系内容、特点及启示

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.04.017

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 84-90.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.04.017

• 体育人文社会学：体育素养 • 上一篇下一篇

基于美国国家课程标准的体育素养评价指标体系内容、特点及启示

刘皓晖¹, 尹志华^1,2, 孟涵¹, 张古月¹, 田恒行³

1.华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海 200241;
2.清华大学体育学博士后流动站,北京 100084;
3.北京体育大学中国篮球运动学院,北京 100084

收稿日期:2021-08-01 修回日期:2022-04-05 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-08-03
通讯作者: 尹志华,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,在站博士后,研究方向:体育教师教育理论与实践。E-mail:yzhkj86888@sina.com。
作者简介:刘皓晖,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:体育教师教育理论与实践。E-mail:lhh990115@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金后期资助一般项目“体育素养国际比较研究”(21FTYB006);国家社会科学基金青年项目“体育教师发展核心素养研究”(16CTY013);中国体育科学学会“高校体育与健康教育课程建设专项课题”重点项目“高校体育教师专业标准体系构建研究”(2021001);中国教育学会教育科研体育与卫生专项一般课题“新时代体育教师师德师风评价指标体系构建研究”(2020TY093117ZB)。

The Content, Characteristics and Enlightenment of the Physical Literacy Assessment Index System Based on American National Curriculum Standards

LIU Haohui¹, YIN Zhihua¹, MENG Han², ZHANG Guyue¹, TIAN Hengxing³

1. College of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241;
2. Postdoctoral mobile station of Physical Education,Tsinghua University,Beijing100084;
3. China Basketball College,Beijing Sports University,Beijing 100084.

Received:2021-08-01 Revised:2022-04-05 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-08-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章旨在分析基于美国国家课程标准的体育素养评价指标体系PE Metrics内容及其特点,提出对我国体育素养评价启示。研究表明:美国体育素养评价提出的背景包括国际热潮、健康危机和素养评价,其发展经历了初步探索期(1983-1999年)、快速发展期(2000-2012年)和成熟稳定期(2013年至今),可被应用于国家大规模体育素养测评、教师课堂教学和学生体育学习参照三种不同情境;美国体育素养评价指标体系包含了面向多方利益相关者的三维目标体系、五位一体的评价内容、多元的评价方法以及K-12一体化的三维评价标准,具有以美国国家课程标准和年级水平成果为导向、以身心一元的整体性融合五维评价模块、以师生主体间性形成体育素养评价的双中心模式、以共同要素为基础在评价内容间形成迁移的特点。最后基于核心素养评价的角度,从评价目标、评价内容、评价方法、评价标准四个方面提出了美国体育素养评价指标体系对我国的启示。

关键词: 体育素养, 体育课程标准, 评价指标体系, PE Metrics, 美国

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the content and characteristics of PE metrics, namely, the physical literacy assessment index system based on American national curriculum standards, and expoundits enlightenment for physical literacy evaluation in China. The research shows that: American physical literacy assessmentindex system was adopted under the background of international upsurge, health crisis and literacy assessment. It has undergone the initial exploration period (1983-1999), the rapid development period (2000-2012) and the mature and stable period (2013 to present), and can be applied to 3 different situations: national large-scale physical literacy assessment, teachers'classroom teaching and students'physical education learning; taking into consideration of the interests of multiple stakeholders, it is composed a three-dimensional objective system, five-in-one assessment content, diverseassessment methods, and three-dimensional assessment criteria for K-12 physical education. It is characterized by integrating the five-dimensional assessment modules targeted at the overall assessment of American national curriculum standards, grade-level outcomes, and physical-mental integrity, constructing a dual-centered model of physical education assessment based on the inter-subjectivity between teachers and students, and applying in a flexible way the assessment content based on common elements. Finally, from the perspective of core competencies assessment, this paper expoundsthe enlightenment of American physical literacy assessment index system for China from the four aspects of assessment objective, assessment content, assessment method and assessmentstandard.

Key words: physical literacy, physical education curriculum standard, assessment index system, PE Metrics, U.S.A

中图分类号:

G807

刘皓晖, 尹志华, 孟涵, 张古月, 田恒行. 基于美国国家课程标准的体育素养评价指标体系内容、特点及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(4): 84-90.

LIU Haohui, YIN Zhihua, MENG Han, ZHANG Guyue, TIAN Hengxing. The Content, Characteristics and Enlightenment of the Physical Literacy Assessment Index System Based on American National Curriculum Standards[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2022, 48(4): 84-90.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.04.017

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V48/I4/84

参考文献

[1] 尹志华,孙铭珠,汪晓赞.核心素养视域下发达国家体育课程标准比较与发展趋势分析[J].天津体育学院学报,2020,35(6):626-632.
[2] SHAPE America Society of Health and Physical Educators. PE Metrics 3rd Edition: Assessing Student Performance Using the National Standards & Grade-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education[M]. Human Kinetics,2018:18-19.
[3] WHITEHEAD M. The concept of physical literacy[J]. European Journal of Physical Education, 2001,6(2):127-138.
[4] ROETERT E P,MACDONALD L C. Unpacking the physical literacy concept for K-12 physical education: What should we expect the learner to master? [J]. Journal of Sport and Health Science,2015,4(2): 108-112.
[5] AFSHIN A, FOROUZANFAR MH, REITSMA M B. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years[J]. New England Journal of Medicine,2017,377(1):13-27
[6] 孟涵,尹志华,张古月,等.美国青少年体育素养培养体系特征及启示[J].体育文化导刊,2021,39(11):104-110.
[7] WEIMO Z, JUDY R.PE Metrics: Background, Testing Theory, and Methods[J]. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2011,15(2) :87-99.
[8] BEN D, JUDITH H P, KIM C G, et al. Development of PE Metrics Elementary Assessments for National Physical Education Standard 1[J]. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,2011,15(2):100-118.
[9] National Association for Sport and Physical Education.PE Metrics－Assessing National Standards 1-6 in Elementary School[M].Sewickley: AAHPERD,2010: 7.
[10] 尹志华,张古月,孙铭珠.关照健康:重大疫情下体育与健康课程面临的挑战、责任和未来转向[J].体育成人教育学刊,2020,36(2):20-25.
[11] 张大超,杨娟.美国3版《K-12国家体育教育标准》演变对学校体育影响的比较研究及启示[J].体育科学,2017,37(10):21-31.
[12] MALINA R M. Movement proficiency in childhood: implications for physical activity and youth sport[J]. Kinesiologia Slovenica, 2012,18(3):19–34.
[13] HUSNMAN G, HUSNMAN C, CARBONNEAUK. Addressing Educational Reform: Exploring PE Metrics as a System to Measure Student Achievement in Physical Education[J]. Physical Educator, 2015,72(1):179–191.
[14] FISETTE J, FRANCK M. How teachers can use PE Metrics for formative assessment[J]. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 2013,83(5):23–24.
[15] 汪晓赞,尹志华,Lynn Dale Housner,黄景旸,季浏.美国国家体育课程标准的历史流变与特点分析[J].成都体育学院学报,2015,41(2):8-15.
[16] WHITEHEAD M, DURDEN M, ELIZABETH J, et al. The value of fostering physical literacy[J]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,2018,37(3):252-262
[17] 孙铭珠,尹志华,Phillip Ward.分类视角下美国地方本科院校体育教育专业课程设置特点及启示[J].河北体育学院学报,2021,35(1):69-76.
[18] STAGE F K. Common elements of theory-A framework for college student development[J]. Journal of college student development,1991,32(1):56-61
[19] 尹志华,孟涵,孙铭珠,等. 新课标背景下体育与健康课程落实核心素养培养的思维原则与实践路径[J].首都体育学院学报,2022,34(3):253-262.

基于美国国家课程标准的体育素养评价指标体系内容、特点及启示

The Content, Characteristics and Enlightenment of the Physical Literacy Assessment Index System Based on American National Curriculum Standards

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张俊杰, 刘海元, 展恩燕. 中外学生体质健康测试制度概述、比较与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 75-84.
[2]	王海峰, 吴小圆, 马文博, 岳建军, 赵天熠. 治理能力现代化背景下美国体育推广人的制度治理及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(6): 116-121.
[3]	彭国强, 高庆勇, 季浏. 美国体育对外交往嬗变的历程、特征与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(5): 117-123.
[4]	茹亚伟,郭振,刘波. 冷战与奥林匹克——读《冷战运动会:宣传、奥林匹克和美国外交政策》[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 139-142.
[5]	袁广锋, 李明达, 张水顺, 郑祥荣, 陈明祥, 何雅文. 基于社会生态学理论的美国5～12岁儿童课外身体活动综合干预的特点与启示——以美国俄亥俄州哥伦布为例[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(2): 104-109.
[6]	王海峰, 吴小圆, 李乐虎, 孙晋海. 美国搏击赛事制度治理特征与启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(6): 32-38.
[7]	韩云, 魏德样. 美国户外休闲产业区域竞争力评价及主导项目选择研究——基于偏离—份额分析法的分析[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(6): 39-47.
[8]	姜勇, 朱美晓, 赵洪波. 文化回应教学视域下青少年体育素养解析及培养路径[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(5): 39-44.
[9]	万宏. 美国《青少年篮球运动指南》的执行理念与参与规范解读及镜鉴[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(5): 45-51.
[10]	赵雅萍, 孙晋海, 陈思同, 蔡捷. 加拿大幼儿体育素养测评工具Pre PLAy解读及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(5): 52-58.
[11]	李卫东, 沈鹤军, 朱乔. 国内外体育素养文献分析与对比研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(1): 41-49.
[12]	杨小帆, 吴相雷, 李卫东, 陶玉流. 美国城市社区体育的发展模式、组织型态与经验[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(1): 79-86.
[13]	王涛, 李卫东. 美国体育课程教学模式的历史演进及其实践启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(6): 34-40.
[14]	彭国强, 高庆勇. 美国大学竞技体育的制度治理及其特征[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 45(4): 74-81.
[15]	刘玉洁, 李佩璟. 美国体育与健康组织框架研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(3): 13-18.