主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 85-91.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2022.01.014

• 体育赛事研究专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

冬奥会比赛小项的主场效应特征及对中国备战北京2022冬奥会的启示

何依蔓1, 欧欣蓉1, 胡旭1, 林孟2, 李娟1, 田慧1   

  1. 1.北京体育大学国际体育组织学院,北京 100084;
    2.北京体育大学中国冰上运动学院,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-27 修回日期:2021-09-24 出版日期:2022-01-15 发布日期:2022-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 田慧,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:体育人文社会学、中外体育人文交流。E-mail: tianhui@bsu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:何依蔓,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向:中外体育人文交流、青少年体育。E-mail: heyiman@bsu.edu.cn。

Home Advantage in the Winter Olympic Events and Its Implications for China's Preparation towards 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games

HE Yiman1, OU Xinrong1, HU Xu1, LIN Meng2, LI Juan1, TIAN Hui1   

  1. 1. School of International Sport Organizations, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084;
    2. China Ice Sports College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084
  • Received:2021-07-27 Revised:2021-09-24 Online:2022-01-15 Published:2022-01-30

摘要: 目的:基于近10届冬奥会比赛小项中的主场效应特征,为中国备战北京2022冬奥会提出建议。方法:将近10届冬奥会所有比赛小项分为:(1)场地差异项目、主观评分项目和其他项目(2)冰上和雪上项目(3)男子、女子和混合项目。使用威尔科克森符号秩检验对主场优势系数进行统计学分析。结果:(1)场地差异(0.05<P<0.1)和主观评分项目(P<0.05)具有主场效应趋势;(2)冰上项目有显著主场效应(P<0.01),具有场地差异的冰上项目有显著主场效应(P<0.05);(3)主观评分的雪上项目有显著主场效应(P<0.05);(4)男子项目有显著主场效应(P<0.01),其场地差异、主观评分以及其他项目中均出现主场效应趋势(0.05<P<0.1;0.05<P<0.1;P<0.05)。结论:冬奥会不同类型的比赛小项主场优势效应程度不一,场地熟悉度、主观评分和性别等可能是重要影响因素。中国备战北京2022冬奥会时,应结合疫情防控实践着力增强主场效应,实现突破;冰上和雪上项目实行差异化备战,重冰稳雪;关注男女运动员竞赛心理和竞赛表现上的差异,激发潜能。

关键词: 冬奥会, 主场优势, 比赛小项, 备战策略, 奥运会, 主场效应

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to explore the features of home advantage in Winter Olympic events, and put forward China's preparation strategies towards the Beijing 2022 Winter Games. Methods: All events in the last 10 Winter Olympics were included and grouped into (1) events at variable venues, with subjective judgement and other events; (2) events on ice and on snow; (3) men's, women's and mixed events. The effects of home advantage in all events were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Significant home advantage is found in: (1) events at variable venues and with subjective judgement (0.05<P<0.1; P<0.05); (2) ice events on the whole (P<0.01) and ice events at variable venues (P<0.05); (3) snow events with subjective judgement (P<0.05); and (4) men's events (P<0.01), which showed home advantage regardless of differences in familiarity with venues and subjective judgement. Conclusion: Home advantage varies for different types of Winter Olympic events. Familiarity with the venues, subjective judgement and gender are possible correlates of home advantage. Implications: When preparing for the Beijing 2022 Winter Games, China should (1) adopt COVID-specific preparation strategies to strengthen its home advantage; (2) adopt different development strategies for ice and snow events; (3) address the differences in psychology and performance between male and female athletes to bring out the best possible performances.

Key words: Winter Olympic Games, home advantage, events, preparation strategy, Olympic Games, home-field effect

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发