主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 7-12.

• 探索与争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

“周期”训练理论的重新审视——以张虹2014、2018年冬奥会周期训练模式为案例

刘俊一   

  1. 东北师范大学体育学院,吉林 长春 130024
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-12 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-23
  • 作者简介:刘俊一,博士,副教授,研究方向:运动训练原理与方法,E-mail:liujy988@nenu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    2015年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“冬季奥林匹克运动会的历史演进与现实启示研究”(15YJA890015)。

A Re-examination of the "Cycle" Training Theory—A Case Study of Zhang Hong's 2014 and 2018 Winter Olympic Cycle Training Pattern

LIU Junyi   

  1. School of PE, North East University, Changchun Jilin 130024
  • Received:2017-04-12 Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-23

摘要: 随着竞技体育的职业化和商业化的发展,对一些体能类项目的高水平运动员全年参加重大比赛而一贯遵循的多年大周期训练理论形成了冲击,一些运动训练指导者开始质疑甚至摒弃“周期”训练理论。以案例分析法和访谈法对张虹奥运会4年全周期训练模式进行重现和分析,力图重新审视“周期”训练理论,从方法论的层面揭示“周期”训练理论演进过程中,必然经历多次的理论变迁和不同角度的质疑,对其理论内在逻辑的审视有利于该理论在发展中寻找变革发展与稳定之间的某种平衡,从而建立更为科学系统的理论体系。

关键词: 周期训练模式, 训练理论, 重新审视, 冬奥会, 案例, 张虹

Abstract: Professionalization and commercialization in competitive sports have posed a change to the multi-year cycle training theory to which elite athletes taking part in major sports events all year round strictly adhere, as a result, some instructors have started to question and even abandon the "cycle" training theory. By means of case study and interview, the present paper analyzed Zhang hong's 4-year Olympic cycle training pattern, aiming to re-examine the "cycle" training theory and reveal that in the process of advancement, the theory has to undergo a series of transformation and face doubts from different perspectives. A reexamination of its inner logic will help strike a balance between the theory's change and stability so as to make theory more scientific and systematic.

Key words: cycle, training theory, reexamination, Winter Olympics, case, Zhang Hong

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发