主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 66-69.

• 运动项目教学训练理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

运动竞赛规则合理性之评价向度

刘淑英,王建平   

  1. 江西财经大学体育学院,江西南昌330013
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-24 修回日期:2014-01-03 出版日期:2013-06-01 发布日期:2014-01-03
  • 作者简介:刘淑英(1972-),女,副教授,博士,硕士研究生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目规划视域中的竞技体育伦理体系构建研究。

Evaluation Dimension for the Rationality of Sports Competition Rules

LIU Shu-Ying,WANG Jian-Ping   

  1. Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics, Nanchang Jiangxi, 330013
  • Received:2013-01-24 Revised:2014-01-03 Online:2013-06-01 Published:2014-01-03

摘要: 运用文献资料法,结合一些实际比赛案例,对运动竞赛规则基本理论进行重新审视,剖析运动竞赛规则合理性的评价向度,认为运动竞赛规则应该从价值合理性、工具合理性和形式合理性几个向度进行评价。当三者不一致甚至发生冲突时,价值合理性应是运动员比赛或裁判员判罚的首要依据。运动员对规则漏洞的利用,尽管没有违背比赛的显规则、正式规则,但充分利用了运动竞赛的潜规则,违背了人们已经达成共识的非正式规则,损害了体育运动精神,破坏了竞技运动应有的教育价值和示范效应。

关键词: 运动竞赛规则, 合理性, 评价向度

Abstract: The basic theories and the evaluation dimension of the rationality of sports competition rules are analyzed in the paper by reviewing literature and combining some practical competition examples. It is believed that sports competition rules should be analyzed from the dimensions of rationality for value, tool and form. Value rationality should be the first criterion for players' competition and referees' judgment when contradictions are witnessed among them. The use of rule loopholes on the part of athletes does not violate the public and formal rules, but it takes advantage of the hidden rules in sports competition, which violates the commonly agreed rules, damages sportsmanship and ruins the educational value and demonstration effects of competitive sports.

Key words: sports competition rules, rationality, evaluation dimensions

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发