主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 49-54.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.03.008

• 体育产业 • 上一篇    下一篇

体育产业项目何以能嵌入农村?——基于村民自主与政府主导两种模式的比较研究

朱罗敬1, 杨叶凌2, 李兵3   

  1. 1.湖南第一师范学院体育学院,湖南 长沙 410004;
    2.华南理工大学体育学院,广东 广州 510641;
    3.湖南财政经济学院体育学院,湖南 长沙 410000
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-10 修回日期:2022-09-22 发布日期:2023-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 李兵,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:体育社会组织,体育产业;E-mail:lb2468②sina.com。
  • 作者简介:朱罗敬,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,研究方向:体育人文社会学;E-mail:2016101170005@whu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“新时代基层体育社会组织的发展创新研究”(18BTY045);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“乡村振兴战略下湖南省‘体农旅’综合田园体运行机制研究”(19YBA374)。

How Can Sports Industry Projects Be Embedded into Rural Area Development? ——A Comparative Study Based on the Two Development Models of Villagers Autonomy and Government Dominance

ZHU Luojing1, YANG Yeling2, LI Bing3   

  1. 1. School of Physical Education, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha Hunan 410205;
    2. School of Physical Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Guangdong 510641;
    3. School of Physical Education, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha Hunan 410205
  • Received:2021-12-10 Revised:2022-09-22 Published:2023-07-04

摘要: 文章运用实地考察法与访谈法,基于案例比较,对比村民自主与政府主导两种发展模式的优劣。调查发现,体育产业项目嵌入农村的三大核心要素分别是融资渠道、土地与利益分配。研究围绕核心要素提出体育产业项目嵌入农村的三条优化路径:(1)嵌入非替代,发展与农村主流经济模式相匹配的适度规模“体育+”新业态;(2)审慎再审慎,有条件推进农村土地产权转让改革;(3)治理需转型,建设服务导向型政府治理模式。提出体育产业项目下乡三重意义:(1)经济意义:产业结构和转型的双重发展需求;(2)社会意义:持续性助推城乡融合发展;(3)治理意义:“国家—农村”治理关系的现代化转型。

关键词: 村民自主, 政府主导, 体育产业, 模式, 体育治理, 乡村振兴

Abstract: Based on the methods of field investigation, interview and case comparative analysis, this article compares the advantages and disadvantages of the two mainstream development models of villager autonomy and government dominance. The survey found that the three core elements of sports industry projects embedded in rural areas are financing channels, land, and interest distribution. The research proposes an optimization path for embedding sports industry projects into rural areas around the core elements: (1) Developing a “sports agriculture+” business format of moderate scale that suits rural economic organizations; (2) Conditionally promoting the reform of rural land property rights transfer; (3) Building a service-oriented government governance model. In addition, this article the triple meaning of embedding sports industry projects into rural area development: (1) Economic meaning: the dual development needs of industrial structure and transformation; (2) Societal meaning: sustained promotion of urban-rural integration development; (3) Governance meaning: the modernization transformation of the “state-rural area” governance relationship.

Key words: villagers autonomy, government dominance, sports industry, model, sports governance, rural revitalization

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发