亚洲传统武术“正宗性”①的发明

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.022

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 136-142.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.022

• 域外视野 • 上一篇

亚洲传统武术“正宗性”^①的发明

Paul Bowman¹著, 马秀杰^2,3译

1.卡迪夫大学新闻传播与文化学院,威尔士卡迪夫 CF10 3NB;
2.成都体育学院中华国术院,四川成都 610041;
3.成都体育学院武术学院,四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2020-12-25 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-03-26
通讯作者: 马秀杰,博士,副教授,研究方向:武术文化传承与发展、武术文化跨文化传播。E-mail:ma.xiujie@outlook.com。
作者简介:Paul Bowman,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:文化学与武术学。E-mail:BowmanP@cardiff.ac.uk。
基金资助:
国家社科基金“中国武术国际软实力研究”(17BTY109)。

The Invention of Authenticity in Traditional Asian Martial Arts

Paul Bowman¹, Ma Xiujie^2,3

1. School of Journalism, Media and Culture,Cardiff University,Cardiff CF10 1FS ,UK;
2. Chinese National Arts College, Chengdu sport University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041;
3. School of Martial Arts, Chengdu sport University, Chengdu Sichuan 61004

Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2020-12-25 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章通过对亚洲传统武术“正宗性”的审视,探寻亚洲传统武术的“正宗性”与“非正宗性”的二元论在西方人意象中的这一现状,分析西方人对亚洲传统武术“正宗性”的渴望以及亚洲在传承过程中“正宗性”流变的必然性等问题。与此同时,研究运用德里达解构主义从微观本体论的角度提出了“亚洲传统武术在传承过程中的改变是不可避免的”这一论述。为进一步证实此观点,以太极拳为案例研究讨论了改变的形式、改变的内容,以及传统太极拳在西方的表现特点。文章意在呼吁全世界的武术学者与传承者传播正确的知识,而不是过度地追求“发明”的“正宗性”。

关键词: 亚洲传统武术, 正宗性, 东方主义, 传统太极拳, 解构主义

Abstract: This paper explores the existing dualism of "authenticity" and "non-authenticity" in traditional Asian martial arts in the Western imagery. By examining of the concept of "authenticity" it analyzes the desire for authenticity of traditional Asian martial arts. In the process of deconstruction of the micro-ontology of "change" in general, and "change" in traditional Asian martial arts in particular, it shows that all change is inevitable. This thesis is supported by a discussion of the forms of change, the contents of change, and a case study of the developments in traditional Chinese Taijiquan in the West. In conclusion, this paper calls for scholars and researchers to acknowledge the existence of these factors in order to spread better knowledge.

Key words: Asian traditional martial arts, authenticity, Orientalism, Traditional Tai Chi, Deconstruction

中图分类号:

G80-054

Paul Bowman, 马秀杰. 亚洲传统武术“正宗性”^①的发明[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(2): 136-142.

Paul Bowman, Ma Xiujie. The Invention of Authenticity in Traditional Asian Martial Arts[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2021, 47(2): 136-142.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2021.02.022

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V47/I2/136

参考文献

[1] BOWMAN P. Martial arts studies: disrupting disciplinary boundaries[M]. London: Rowman and Littlefield International, 2015.
[2] BOWMAN P. Mythologies of martial arts[M]. London: Rowman& Littlefield International, 2017.
[3] IWAMURA J N. The oriental monk in American popular culture[M]//FORBES B D, MAHAN J H. Religion and popular culture in America (pp. 25-43). Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press, 2005:25-43.
[4] PARK J C H. Yellow future: oriental style in Hollywood cinema[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010:174-178.
[5] TRAUSCH T. Martial arts as embodied, discursive and aesthetic practice[M]//BOWMAN P. The martial arts studies reader. London: Rowman& Littlefield International, 2018:187-198.
[6] KRUG G J. At the Feet of the Master: Three stages in the appropriation of Okinawan Karate into Anglo-American culture[J]. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 2001,1(4):395-410.
[7] WEBER S. Institution and interpretation[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987:152-166.
[8] BOWMAN P. Beyond Bruce Lee: chasing the dragon through film, philosophy, and popular culture[M]. Columbia University Press, 2013:10-18.
[9] FOUCAULT M. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences[M]. London: Tavistock Publications, 1970:55-80.
[10] FOUCAULT M. The Foucault reader (Penguin reprint.) [M]. London: Penguin Books, 1991:1-19.
[11] BARTHES R. Mythologies[M]. Paris:Les Lettresnouvelles, 1957:1-30.
[12] GOTO-JONESC. Magic, modernity, and orientalism: conjuring representations of Asia[J]. Modern Asian Studies, 2014,48(06):1451-1476.
[13] SAID E W. Orientalism: western conceptions of the orient[M]. London: Penguin, 1978:143.
[14] SAID E W. Invention, memory, and place[M]//LEISTYAN P.Cultural studies: from theory to action. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005:256-269.
[15] CHOW R. Primitive passions: visuality, sexuality, ethnography, and contemporary Chinese cinema[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,1995.
[16] GREGG M, SEIGWORTH G J. The affect theory reader[M]. Duke University Press,2010.
[17] MCCAUGHEY M. Real knockouts the physical feminism of women's self-defense[M]. New York; London: NYU Press,1997:1-20.
[18] JUDKINS B N. The exotic, feminine and dangerous: how the "yellow peril" set the stage for the cultural appropriation of the Asian martial arts, 1902-1918[EB/OL]. [2016-01-29].http://chinesemartialstudies.com/2016/01/29/the-exotic-feminine-and-dangerous-how-the-yellow-peril-set-the-stage-for-the-cultural-appropriation-of-the-asian-martial-arts-1902-1918/.
[19] MA S. The deathly embrace: orientalism and Asian American identity[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,2000: XI-XXIII.
[20] MARCHETTI G. Romance and the 'Yellow Peril': race, sex, and discursive strategies in Hollywood fiction[M]. University of California Press,1994:233.
[21] TIERNEYS M. Themes of whiteness in Bulletproof Monk, Kill Bill, and The Last Samurai[J]. Journal of Communication,2006, (56): 607-624.
[22] CHOW R. Ethics after idealism: theory, culture, ethnicity, reading[M]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,1998: II-XXII.
[23] HEATH J, POTTER A. The rebel sell: how the counterculture became consumer culture[M]. Chichester: Capstone, 2006:62.
[24] CHOW R. The protestant ethnic and the spirit of capitalism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,2002:1-17.
[25] CULLER J. The semiotics of tourism[M]. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press,1990:1-10.
[26] FABIAN J. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object[M]. New York; Guildford: Columbia University Press,1983: VII-XXVII.
[27] JUDKINS B N, Nielson J. The creation of Wing Chun: a social history of the Southern Chinese martial arts[M]. SUNY Press,2015:1-15.
[28] WILED. Book review of: The creation of Wing Chun: a social history of the Southern Chinese martial arts[J]. Martial Arts Studies, 2015,1(1):83-85.
[29] HOBSBAWM E J, RangerT O. The invention of tradition[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1983:15-43.
[30] BOWMAN P. The Intimate schoolmaster and the ignorant Sifu: poststructuralism, Bruce Lee, and the ignorance of everyday radical pedagogy[J]. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 2016, 49(4):549-570.
[31] RANCIRE J. The ignorant schoolmaster: five lessons in intellectual emancipation[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press,1991:1-148.
[32] TAN K S Y. Constructing a martial tradition: rethinking a popular history of Karate-Dou[J]. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 2004,28(2): 169-192.
[33] BAUDRILLARD J. Simulations[M]. New York City, NY, USA: Semiotext(e), Inc,1983:48.
[34] BAUDRILLARD J. Simulacra and simulation[M]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press,1994:1-129.
[35] BAUDRILLARD J. America[M]. London: Verso, 1989.
[36] BOWMAN P. Making martial arts history matter[J]. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 2016, 33(9):1-19.
[37] CHAN S. The construction and export of culture as artefact: the case of Japanese martial arts[J]. Body & Society, 2000,6(1):69-74.
[38] FRANK A. Taijiquan and the search for the little old Chinese man: understanding identity through martial arts[D]. Palgrave Macmillan,2006.
[39] BOWMAN P. Deconstructing martial arts[M]. Cardiff: Cardiff University Press,2019.
[40] ABBAS A. Hong Kong: culture and the politics of disappearance[M]. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press,1997:10-160.
[41] OSMAN I. Media, diaspora and the Somali conflict[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,2017.
[42] MIRACLE J. Now with Kung Fu Grip!: how bodybuilders, soldiers and a hairdresser reinvented martial arts for America[M]. MCFARLAND & Company Incorporated,2016:4-17.
[43] WILE D. Lost T'ai Chi classics of the late Ch'ing dynasty[M]. New York: State University of New York,1996:1-30.
[44] HENNING S. Ignorance, legend and Taijiquan[J]. Journal of the Chen Style Taijiquan Research Association Of Hawaii, 1994,2(3):1-7.
[45] WETZLER S. Myths of the martial arts[J]. JOMEC Journal, 2014,(5): 1-12.
[46] DERRIDA J. Remarks on deconstruction and pragmatism[M]. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism. London: Routledge,1996:40-65.
[47] BOWMAN P. Post-Marxism versus cultural studies: theory, politics and intervention[M]. Edinburgh University Press,2007:1-10.
[48] SPATZ B. What a body can do: technique as knowledge, practice as research[M]. London and New York: Routledge,2015.
[49] DERRIDA J. Of grammatology[M]. (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore?; London: Johns Hopkins University Press,1976.
[50] BOWMANP. Deconstructing popular culture[M]. Palgrave Macmillan,2008.
[51] FARRER DS. Efficacy and entertainment in martial arts studies: anthropological perspectives[J]. Martial Arts Studies, 2015,1(1):34-45.
[52] DOWNEY G. Learning capoeira: lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2005:1-30.
[53] LITTLE W. Putting the harm back into harmony: Aikido, violence and 'truth in the martial arts'[J]. Martial Arts Studies, 2018,6(0).
[54] SPENCER D. Ultimate fighting and embodiment: violence, gender and mixed martial arts[M]. London and New York: Routledge,2011:1-18.
[55] LACLAU E, MOUFFE C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics[M]. London: Verso,1985:1-21.
[56] WATTS A. The way of Zen[M]. London: Arkana,1990:1-6.
[57] DERRIDA J. Monolingualism of the other, or, The prosthesis of origin[M]. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press,1998:1-13.
[58] SINGLETON M. Yoga body: The origins of modern posture practice[M]. Oxford University Press,2010:1-18.
[59] WILE D. T'ai-chi's ancestors: the making of an internal martial art[M]. Sweet Ch'i Press,1999:1-23.
[60] RYAN A. Globalisation and the 'internal alchemy' in Chinese martial arts: the transmission of Taijiquan to Britain[J]. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 2008,2(4):525-543.
[61] EPERJESI J R. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Kung Fu diplomacy and the dream of cultural China[J]. Asian Studies Review, 2004, 28(1):25-39.
[62] GARCÍA R S. An introduction to the historical sociology of Japanese martial arts[J]. Martial Arts Studies, 2018, 6: 75-87.

亚洲传统武术“正宗性”^①的发明

The Invention of Authenticity in Traditional Asian Martial Arts

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	戴羽, 高海杰, 刘青. 中国古代竞戏判例研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 94-100.
[2]	贺婧. 新中国体育“一报一刊”的媒介话语流变与价值建构[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 101-106.
[3]	何涛, 杨丽芳. 成渝地区双城经济圈体育非物质文化遗产空间聚合与协同传承的实现路径研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(1): 58-65.
[4]	霍传颂, 袁彬. 第7届体育学科发展青年论坛优秀论文——体育翻译探访:内涵特征、人才培养与未来向度[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 57-62.
[5]	刘雨, 陶朔秀, 杜俊儒. 赋能与援应:体育强国建设中民间体育的发展路向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 63-67.
[6]	徐泉森, 徐帆. “志坚行苦”——中国拳击队出征1936年柏林奥运会过程考略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 114-117.
[7]	白翊辰, 石岩, 周浩. 全面抗战时期八路军120师“战斗篮球队”的活动及影响研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 118-123.
[8]	饶林峰. 国际史研究方法下的中国体育:评《奥林匹克之梦——中国与体育1895-2008》[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 136-142.
[9]	郑祥荣. 现象学视域下运动技能的审美价值[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(5): 65-70.
[10]	孙德朝. 彝族蹢脚舞的身体符号及文化记忆研究 ——以四川省会理市小黑箐镇白沙村为例[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(4): 63-70.
[11]	吴梦园. 国家与性别:民国时期反对女子“剧烈运动”的话语传播及再造[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 35-40.
[12]	张晓琳,姜志明. 羁绊、平等、自由:女性参与马拉松运动的抗争、诉求与超越[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 41-46.
[13]	程宇飞,范尧. 社会性别视角下体育对男性青少年男性气概的影响研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 134-138.
[14]	茹亚伟,郭振,刘波. 冷战与奥林匹克——读《冷战运动会:宣传、奥林匹克和美国外交政策》[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 139-142.
[15]	段增光, 何颖, 邱建钢, 戴郁珠. 文化共生理论下的中国体育舞蹈百年发展研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(2): 86-92.