2017赛季CSL各球队攻防能力排序与档位划分研究

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2019.02.015

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 95-102.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2019.02.015

2017赛季CSL各球队攻防能力排序与档位划分研究

陈翀¹, 王朝信², 丰保成¹, 胡洪泉¹, 康金明¹, 陈效科³

1.聊城大学体育学院,山东聊城 252059;
2.菏泽学院体育与健康学院,山东菏泽 274015;
3.北京体育大学,北京 100084

收稿日期:2018-04-09 出版日期:2019-03-15 发布日期:2019-04-03
作者简介:陈翀,博士,副教授,研究方向:足球教学与训练研究,E-mail:chenchong753@163.com。
基金资助:
山东省社会科学规划研究项目“山东省校园足球内涵式发展研究”(17CTYJ15)

The Research on Sorting and Staging of Attack and Defense Ability of CSL in 2017 Season

CHEN Chong¹, WANG Chaoxin², FENG Baocheng¹, HU Hongquan¹, Kang Jinming¹, CHEN Xiaoke³

1.School of Physical Education,LiaochengUniversity,Liaocheng,Shandong 252059;
2. Sport and Health Colledge,HezeUniversity,Heze,Shandong 274015;
3.Beijing Sports University,Beijing 100084

Received:2018-04-09 Online:2019-03-15 Published:2019-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探索2017CSL各球队攻防能力排序特征和档位划分的合理性。主要运用文献资料法、问卷调查法、录像观察法、TOPSIS法和RSR法等研究方法,对2017赛季CSL 240场比赛中攻防能力指标进行统计分析,结果表明:(1)进攻能力方面,C＞0.5的有4支球队;防守能力C＞0.5的有8支球队,攻防综合能力C＞0.5的有4支球队,攻防能力排序与球队比赛排名基本吻合。(2)分档标准:C＞0.5560为1档,C＞0.3166为2档,C＜0.3166为3档。结论: (1)CSL各支球队攻防能力排序表现出与比赛排名相一致的特征,TOPSIS评价能够较好的反映各球队的进攻能力和攻防综合能力,基本反映出各球队的防守能力。(2)2017CSL共分为3个档位,RSR法能够对CSL各支球队进行合理分档。本研究创新运用TOPSIS法和RSR法相结合,综合量化2017CSL攻防指标能力排序特征和档位划分的合理性,为今后科学的进行中超联赛分析提供有价值的借鉴。

关键词: 2017赛季, CSL, 攻防能力, 排序, 档位划分

Abstract: Objective: To explore the sorting and staging of offensive and defensive abilities of 2017CSL teams. Mainly use the literature, questionnaire,video observation, TOPSIS and RSR, statistic and analyze CSL240 games of 2017 season in the offensive and defensive ability indicators ,The results show that: 1) There are 4 teams in the field of attacking ability, C_i＞0.5;Defensive ability C_i＞0.5 are 8 teams;offensive and defensive comprehensive ability C_i＞0.5 are 4 teams, offensive and defensive ability and team match ranked basically consistent. 2) Sub-file standard: C_i> 0.5560 for 1^st file, C_i > 0.3166 for the 2^nd files, C_i <0.3166 for the 3^rd file. The conclusions follows: 1) The sorting of CSL team's offensive and defensive ability show the characteristics of the performance of the game is consistent with of rankings,The TOPSIS evaluation can reflect the offensive ability,offensive and defensive ability of each team better, and basically reflect the defensive ability of each team. 2) RSR method to CSL teams for a reasonable sub-file. 2017 season is divided into 3 stalls. It creat to combine the TOPSIS and the RSR ,quantifing the rationality of the 2017CSL attack and defense index capability and the division of the stalls, which can provide valuable reference for the future scientific analysis of CSL.

Key words: 2017 season, CSL, Offensive and Defensive ability, Sort, Stall division

中图分类号:

G808-1

陈翀, 王朝信, 丰保成, 胡洪泉, 康金明, 陈效科. 2017赛季CSL各球队攻防能力排序与档位划分研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(2): 95-102.

CHEN Chong, WANG Chaoxin, FENG Baocheng, HU Hongquan, Kang Jinming, CHEN Xiaoke. The Research on Sorting and Staging of Attack and Defense Ability of CSL in 2017 Season[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2019, 45(2): 95-102.

[1]	刘永峰. 伦敦奥运会中国男篮与竞争对手攻防能力的对比研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2013, 39(8): 52-57.
[2]	刘治. 第12届全运会男篮(成年组)八强队伍攻防能力的综合评价[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2013, 39(10): 66-71.

2017赛季CSL各球队攻防能力排序与档位划分研究

The Research on Sorting and Staging of Attack and Defense Ability of CSL in 2017 Season

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价