上坡快走与慢跑过程中能量消耗、脂供能等相关指标变化特征分析

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2017.06.015

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 92-97.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2017.06.015

上坡快走与慢跑过程中能量消耗、脂供能等相关指标变化特征分析

陈万¹, 张懿², 王海宁¹, 李换平¹, 王林芳¹, 葛新发¹

1.山东体育学院,山东济南 250102;
2.贵州省体育科学研究所,贵州贵阳 550002

收稿日期:2017-04-27 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-11-16
作者简介:陈万,博士,教授,研究方向:运动与健身的生物学效应及应用研究,E-mail:chenwan@139.com。
基金资助:
山东省科技发展计划项目“运动性外周疲劳与中枢疲劳的应用研究”(2014GSF122002);山东省自然科学基金项目“神经肌肉疲劳的运动项目特征、肌肉收缩模式及相关因素的研究”(ZR2015CL036)。

Characteristic Analysis of Changes of Energy Expenditure,Fat Energy Supply and Other Related Parameters during both Uphill Brisk Walking and Jogging

CHEN Wan¹, ZHANG Yi², WANG Haining¹, LI Huanping¹, WANG Linfang¹, GE Xinfa¹

1.Shandong Sport University,Jinan Shandong 250102;
2. Guizhou Research Institute of Sports Science,Guiyang Guizhou 550002

Received:2017-04-27 Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:通过对上坡快走与上坡慢跑两种不同运动形式相同速度运动过程中的摄氧量、心率、RPE、核心温度、步频等指标的实时监测,探讨人体在运动过程中相关生理指标的变化特征。方法:选取10名20~25岁的健康男性作为受试者,分别进行上坡快走和上坡慢跑(跑台速度6.4 km/h,坡度10％,运动时间40 min),采用MOXUS气体分析系统以及核心温度检测系统对受试者的相关生理指标进行实时监测。结果:(1)上坡慢跑与上坡快走相比,20 min后最大摄氧量百分比较高(P<0.05);(2)上坡慢跑与上坡快走相比HR较高,且在25 min后所有时间点均有显著性差异(P<0.05);(3)在20 min后的所有时间点,上坡慢跑与上坡快走相比核心温度较高(P<0.05);(4)上坡慢跑10 min与35 min、40 min的最大摄氧量百分比相比较低(P<0.05);上坡快走10 min最大摄氧量百分比与其他时间点相比较低,但差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论:(1)上坡慢跑比上坡快走心肺反应更为强烈,能量消耗更多,这可能是上坡慢跑过程中步频较高等因素导致;(2)上坡慢跑比上坡快走运动结束时核心温度变化大,这可能与上坡慢跑时运动强度和能量消耗较高有关;(3)在上坡慢跑与上坡快走运动过程中,二者糖消耗基本相同,上坡慢跑过程中总能量消耗较高是由脂肪消耗更多导致。

关键词: 上坡快走, 上坡慢跑, 摄氧量, 核心温度, 能量消耗, 步频

Abstract: Objective: To study the changes of oxygen uptake, HR,energy expenditure, RPE, Tc (core temperature, Tc), SF (stride frequency, SF) and other related physiological parameters in real-time during uphill brisk walking and uphill jogging with the same speed. Method: 10 healthy males (20-25 yrs old) were randomly selected as subjects to fulfill both uphill brisk walking and jogging (treadmill speed: 6.4km/h, gradient: 10%, time duration: 40min) in the experiment. MOXUS gas analysis system and core temperature detection system were used to collect physiological parameters in real time. Result: (1) After 20min, the percentage of maximum oxygen uptake (%VO₂max) of uphill jogging group (UJG) was higher than that of uphill brisk walking group (UBWG) (P<0.05). (2) After 25min, the HR of UJG was higher than that of UBWG (P<0.05). (3) After 20min, the Tc of uphill jogging group was higher than uphill brisk walking group (P<0.05), at 25min (P<0.01). (4) In UJG, %VO₂max at both 35min and 40min were higher than that at 10min (P<0.05); Otherwise there was no such changes in UBWG (P>0.05). Conclusion: (1) Cardiopulmonary reaction and energy expenditure of UJG are more intense than those of UBWG. These differences could result from the higher stride frequency in UBWG . (2) The increase of Tc of UJG is higher than that of UBWG. The difference could result from higher levels of exercise intensity and energy expenditure of UJG.(3)During the 40min UJG and UBWG exercise, carbohydrates consumption was the same, but the fat consumption was higher in UJG.

Key words: uphill brisk walking, uphill jogging, oxygen uptake, core temperature, energy expenditure, stride frequency

中图分类号:

G804.2

陈万, 张懿, 王海宁, 李换平, 王林芳, 葛新发. 上坡快走与慢跑过程中能量消耗、脂供能等相关指标变化特征分析[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2017, 43(6): 92-97.

CHEN Wan, ZHANG Yi, WANG Haining, LI Huanping, WANG Linfang, GE Xinfa. Characteristic Analysis of Changes of Energy Expenditure,Fat Energy Supply and Other Related Parameters during both Uphill Brisk Walking and Jogging[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2017, 43(6): 92-97.

[1]	何美婷, 张培珍, 洪平. 成年男性场地不同强度负重步行时的能量消耗特征研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(3): 113-119.
[2]	汪军, 周越, 孙君志, 于亮, 徐玉明, 张学林, 张日辉, 李顺昌, 黄文英, 夏志, 赵广高, 黎涌明, 胡敏, 田振军, 苏全生, 张勇, 王瑞元. 质疑与思考:运动生理学研究的十个问题[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47(1): 118-124.
[3]	黄婷, 赵广高, 梁凯婷, 何梓豪, 全明辉, 苏利强, 夏志, 付近梅, 孙顺利, 吕文娣, 王润泽. 冠状病毒对感染患者心肺适能与肌肉适能影响的系统评价[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(6): 92-99.
[4]	缪律, 史国生, 黎涌明. 足球比赛的负荷量化—结构、方法和特征[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2020, 46(2): 93-99.
[5]	胡海旭, 吕玉军, 贺茜娜, 宋卫东. 男大学生有氧能力/心肺适能的跑步测评方式验证与比较[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(5): 115-121.
[6]	郭辉, 孙景权, 张一民. 六分钟上下楼梯试验与摄氧量的相关性研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2016, 42(3): 14-18.
[7]	李秋捷,曲峰,万祥林. 限制手臂摆动对人体步行影响的生物力学研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2016, 42(1): 103-108.
[8]	冯玮, 邱俊强, 衣龙燕. 田径1 500米跑运动员专项能力评估方法构建[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2015, 41(1): 13-17.
[9]	谭世文，刘忆冰，于淼. 复方中药吸入对大鼠有氧运动能力影响的研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2013, 39(12): 76-79.

上坡快走与慢跑过程中能量消耗、脂供能等相关指标变化特征分析

Characteristic Analysis of Changes of Energy Expenditure,Fat Energy Supply and Other Related Parameters during both Uphill Brisk Walking and Jogging

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价