主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 45-50.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2015.04.08

• 体育人文社会科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

范式、根源与出路:田径课程的“兴趣问题”

孙有平,张磊   

  1. 华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海 200241
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-01 出版日期:2015-07-15 发布日期:2015-07-21
  • 作者简介:孙有平,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向:体育课程与教学、运动训练理论与实践。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科规划课题(7195029);教育部本科体育教育专业综合改革试点项目(7119686K)。

Paradigm、Root and Outlet: The Interest Problem of Track and Field Curriculum

Sun Youping, Zhang Lei   

  1. College of Physical Education & Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 20041
  • Received:2015-01-01 Online:2015-07-15 Published:2015-07-21

摘要: “学生不喜欢田径课”这一现象长期以来被作为“兴趣问题”得到广泛关注,现有研究从研究方法到研究内容,呈现出了“课程变革范式”与“教学变革范式”两种主要的研究范式。“兴趣问题”作为一个真问题,从席勒的美学观来看,其根源在于感性冲动的“难为”与形式冲动的“钳制”,田径课程若想走出“兴趣问题”的困扰,首先需要正视自己的教育学身份,“游戏冲动的对象——游戏”无疑提供了这样一个机会。

关键词: 田径课程, 兴趣问题, 研究范式, 席勒

Abstract: The phenomenon of "Students don't like the track and field class" has long been concerned as a problem of "interest". There exist two main research paradigms, the "curriculum reform paradigm" and "teaching reform paradigm" in the existing research from research methods to the research content. "Interest problem" is a real problem. From the point of Schiller's aesthetic, its root lies in the "embarrass" of perceptual impulse and the "containment" of form impulse. If track and field class wants to get out of the problem of "interest", the first thing to face up is its identity as pedagogy, and game as the object of "game impulse" is no doubt an opportunity.

Key words: Track and Field Curriculum, Interest Problem, Research Paradigm, Schiller

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发