主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 64-72.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2019.05.007

• 体育人文社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

群众体育政策工具选择评估——基于省级全民健身实施计划的内容分析

韩永君   

  1. 四川师范大学 体育学院,四川 成都 610066
  • 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-10-08
  • 作者简介:韩永君, 博士研究生, 副教授, 研究方向:体育政策,E-mail:yongjunhan@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    2014年甘肃省社会科学规划项目:甘肃省全民健身基本公共服务均等化研究(14YB027)。

Evaluation of the Choice of Mass Sports Policy Tools —Content Analysis Based on Provincial National Fitness Implementation Plan

Han Yongjun   

  1. School of Physical Education,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu Sichuan 610066
  • Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-10-08

摘要: 群众体育政策工具选择评估对优化政策执行、提升政府绩效及达成政府既定目标等具有重要影响,而工具选择评估涉及的核心问题是挖掘当前群众体育政策工具选择有何偏好,及探讨这些偏好又会对政府绩效标准产生哪些影响。为了科学回答该问题,文章以31份省级《全民健身实施计划(2016-2020年)》为样本,采用内容分析法,借助软件NVivo 11 pro统计各种政策工具主要标志词的频数,并运用学者萨拉蒙的相关理论作为群众体育政策工具评估框架,评估当前群众体育政策工具选择对中国政府绩效标准的可能影响。结果发现:一方面,群众体育政策工具选择呈现出中强制性、高直接性、低自治性和高可见性偏好;另一方面,不同维度的工具选择偏好有不同绩效特征。据此提出工具选择的三点建议:顺应治理模式主导化趋势,坚持统合原则,树牢“公平首位,兼顾其它”理念。

关键词: 政策工具, 群众体育政策, 工具选择, 评估

Abstract: The selection evaluation of mass sports policy tools has an important impact on optimizing policy implementation, promoting government performance and reaching the established goal of government. The core issues involved in tool selection assessment are the tendency of the choice of the current mass sports policy tools and what influence these tendencies will have on the government performance standards. In order to answer the question scientifically,the article uses the "National Fitness Implementation Plan (2016-2020)" of 31 provincial administrative regions as a sample, adopts the content analysis method, and uses the software NVivo 11 to count the frequency of major policy words of various policy tools. And use the relevant theories of scholar Salamon as a social sports policy tool assessment framework to assess the possible impact of the current choice of social sports policy tools on Chinese government performance standards. The results showed that, on the one hand, the choice of the mass sports policy tools showed a tendency of coercive, high direct, low autonomy and high visibility; on the other hand, the choice of tools in different dimensions had different performance characteristics. Accordingly, three suggestions for tool selection are put forward: conforming to the development trend of socialization, adhering to the principle of optimizing combination, and establishing the concept of "fairness first, taking into account other" firmly.

Key words: policy tools, mass sports policy, tool selection, evaluation

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发