身体活动强度视角下的体育学习投入模型及其学段差异

doi:10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.02.001

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 1-9.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.02.001

• 特稿 • 下一篇

身体活动强度视角下的体育学习投入模型及其学段差异

唐炎, 马晓

上海体育学院,上海 200438

收稿日期:2022-11-20 修回日期:2023-01-26 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-04-11
通讯作者: 马晓,博士,助理研究员,研究方向:学校体育;E-mail:maxiao8725@foxmail.com。
作者简介:唐炎,博士,教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:学校体育;E-mail:tybsh2011@126.com。
基金资助:
上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“中小学生体育课堂学习投入模型的建构与实践应用研究”(2022ETY001)。

Students' PhysicalEducation Learning Engagement Model and the Variation of Different School Age Groups: A Physical Activity Intensity Perspective

TANG Yan, MA Xiao

Shanghai university of sport,Shanghai 200438

Received:2022-11-20 Revised:2023-01-26 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文章以身体活动强度作为因变量,通过实测数据,构建了中小学生体育学习的投入模型,揭示了模型结构的学段差异及其隐含的教学问题。结果表明,教学内容、学练形式、课堂人际氛围、体育功能认同度是学生体育课堂投入水平的主要影响因素,各因素间的效应路径存在鲜明的学段差异。学练方式承载的专业性和人际特征对不同学段学生体育学习投入的提升具有普遍意义,随着学龄增长,体育学习的专业性和价值感对学习投入的影响逐渐增强。

关键词: 学练方式, 体育课堂, 人际氛围, 教学内容, 中高强度身体活动, 学校体育

Abstract: Using physical activity intensity as the dependent variable, the article constructs a physical education learning engagement model of primary and secondary school students based on empirical data, and reveals the variation of different school age groups in the model structure and its implied pedagogical issues. The results show that teaching content, learning and practice format, classroom interpersonal atmosphere, and physical education function recognition are the main factors influencing students' physical education classroom engagement level, and there are distinct school-age differences in the effect paths of the factors. The professionalism and interpersonal characteristics of the learning and practicing style at different school age groups have universal implications for the enhancement of students' physical education learning engagement, and the influence of the professionalism and sense of value of physical education learning on learning engagement gradually increases as school age increases.

Key words: learning and practicing style, physical education classroom, interpersonal atmosphere, teaching content, moderate-to-high intensity physical activity, school physical education

中图分类号:

G807

唐炎, 马晓. 身体活动强度视角下的体育学习投入模型及其学段差异[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(2): 1-9.

TANG Yan, MA Xiao. Students' PhysicalEducation Learning Engagement Model and the Variation of Different School Age Groups: A Physical Activity Intensity Perspective[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2023, 49(2): 1-9.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/10.15942/j.jcsu.2023.02.001

https://cdtyxb.cdsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V49/I2/1

参考文献

[1] FREDRICKS J A, BLUMENFELD P C, PARIS A H. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74(1): 59-109.
[2] ARENS A K, NIEPEL C. School attitude and perceived teacher acceptance: Developmental trajectories, temporal relations, and gender differences[J]. Br J Educ Psychol, 2019, 89(4): 689-706.
[3] STRATI A D, SCHMIDT J A, MAIER K S. Perceived challenge, teacher support, and teacher obstruction as predictors of student engagement[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2017, 109(1): 131-147.
[4] DE LAET S, COLPIN H, VERVOORT E, et al. Developmental trajectories of children's behavioral engagement in late elementary school: Both teachers and peers matter[J]. Developmental Psychology, 2015, 51(9): 1292-1306.
[5] RYAN R M, DECI E L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2020, Article 101860.
[6] WENTZEL K R, BATTLE A, RUSSELL S L, et al. Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2010, 35(3): 193-202.
[7] NÆSS H S, SÄFVENBOM R, STANDA Ø F. Running with Dewey: is it possible to learn to enjoy running in High School Physical Education? [J]. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 2014, 6(2): 301-315.
[8] KINDER C J, GAUDREAULT K, WADE C, et al. At-risk youth in an after-school program: Structured vs. unstructured PA[J]. The Physical Educator, 2019(76): 1157-1180.
[9] LIGHT R. Learner-centred pedagogy for swim coaching: A complex learning theory informed approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2014(5): 167-180.
[10] KINDER C J, GAUDREAULT K, SIMONTON K. Structured and Unstructured Contexts in Physical Education: Promoting Activity, Learning and Motivation[J]. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2020, 91(6): 30-35.
[11] HUÉSCAR HERNÁNDEZ E, ANDRÉS FABRA JA, MORENO-MURCIA JA. Effect of autonomy support and dialogic learning on school children's physical activity and sport[J]. Scand J Psychol, 2020,61(3):402-409
[12] FOREY G, CHEUNG L E. The Benefits of Explicit Teaching of Language for Curriculum Learning in the Physical Education Classroom[J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2019(54): 91-109.
[13] LEPTOKARIDOU E T, VLACHOPOULOS S P, PAPAIOANNOU AG. Associations of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness with Enjoyment and Effort in Elementary School Physical Education: The Mediating Role of Self-Determined Motivation[J]. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 2015(12): 105-128.
[14] HUHTINIEMI M, SÄÄKSLAHTI A, WATT A, et al. Associations among Basic Psychological Needs, Motivation and Enjoyment within Finnish Physical Education Students[J]. J Sports Sci Med, 2019, 18(2):239-247.
[15] SALVY SJ, DE LA HAYE K, BOWKER JC, et al. Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors[J]. Physiol Behav, 2012, 106(3):369-378.
[16] HAMRE BK, PIANTA RC. Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade[J]. Child Dev, 2001, 72(2): 625-638.
[17] 唐炎. 中小学体育课堂教学的社会学分析[D]. 北京:北京体育大学,2005:52.
[18] ECCLES J S. Engagement: Where to next? [J]. Learning & Instruction, 2016(43): 71-75.

身体活动强度视角下的体育学习投入模型及其学段差异

Students' PhysicalEducation Learning Engagement Model and the Variation of Different School Age Groups: A Physical Activity Intensity Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱荣, 杨钰鑫, 高长征. 学校体育课后服务质量提升策略调适[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(3): 92-100.
[2]	覃立, 黎吉权. “双减”政策下体育教育公平审思:意义解读、问题防范与发展路向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(2): 120-126.
[3]	邵天逸, 李启迪. 偏离与归正:快乐体育若干基本问题回溯性反思[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(6): 86-93.
[4]	胡惠芳. 中国初中毕业升学体育考试政策的演进特征与推进策略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 12-21.
[5]	孙科, 杨帆, 朱天宇, 樊菁. 论中国式体育教育现代化[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 38-46.
[6]	何丽娟, 茹秀英. “四位一体”目标下小学体育教学学生自我评价研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(5): 123-130.
[7]	李博, 刘亚男, 施利娟, 朱晓玲, 刘阳. 德国儿童身体协调测评(KTK)解析及信效度验证[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 70-75.
[8]	张晓林, 关清文, 舒为平. 联合国教科文组织优质体育教育政策的演进历程、特征及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(4): 97-105.
[9]	吴相雷, 陶玉流, 李卫东, 彭庆文, 李奕霖, 叶巍. 学科内容知识视域下我国体育教育专业运动技术技能课程教学改革路径研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 105-111.
[10]	薛鹏飞, 曹景川. 学校体育高质量发展:价值意蕴、现实困境与推进策略[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(3): 112-118.
[11]	郇昌店, 杨涛. 新中国青少年体质健康政策的演进历程、逻辑转变和优化方向[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2023, 49(1): 104-110.
[12]	李艳茹, 党许诺. “双减”背景下课后体育服务的现状、问题及优化研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(6): 51-56.
[13]	张丽军,孙有平. 走向主动健康:后疫情时代运动健康教育与大数据融合发展研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 47-52.
[14]	杨燕国,汪晓赞,孔琳. 借鉴与纾解:芬兰“学校运动计划”的特征及启示[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(3): 113-120.
[15]	袁广锋, 李明达, 张水顺, 郑祥荣, 陈明祥, 何雅文. 基于社会生态学理论的美国5～12岁儿童课外身体活动综合干预的特点与启示——以美国俄亥俄州哥伦布为例[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2022, 48(2): 104-109.