主办单位:成都体育学院
ISSN 1001-9154 CN 51-1097/G8

成都体育学院学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 78-82.doi: 10.15942/j.jcsu.2017.02.014

• 运动训练理论与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

高水平乒乓球运动员的行为抑制特点研究

侯爽1,任杰1,陈依梦1,陈彬2,施之皓1   

  1. 1. 上海体育学院乒乓球运动智能化研发中心,上海,200438;
    2. 国家体育总局,北京 100061
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-06 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-23
  • 作者简介:侯爽,硕士,助理研究员,研究方向:竞技运动心理学,E-mail: hs.1234.com@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    1. 上海市科委项目“双色塑料乒乓球动静态力学特征及运动员竞技能力提升的关键技术研究”(14490503500);2. 国家体育总局科研项目“乒乓球运动在延缓老年人认知老化中的作用及其机制”(2015B064)。

Research on the Characteristics of Top Table Tennis Players’Behavior Inhibition

HOU Shuang1, REN Jie1, CHEN Yimeng1, CHEN Bin2, SHI Zhihao1   

  1. 1. Table Tennis intelligent RD Center, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438;
    2.General Administration of Sport of China, Beijing 100061
  • Received:2016-09-06 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-23

摘要: 目的:探讨高水平乒乓球运动员的行为抑制能力特点,了解乒乓球运动经验与行为抑制能力的关系。方法:按照运动等级将被试分为高水平组(健将级)、中等水平组(国家二级)和低水平组(非运动员),对Go/No-go范式的反应方式加以改进,通过短距离和长距离按键反应,选取一般任务和经验任务探讨运动经验对乒乓球运动员行为抑制能力的影响以其迁移效应。结果:1)在短距离按键反应中,高水平组在一般任务中的反应时显著小于其他两组(P<0.01,P<0.001),在经验任务中的反应时也显著小于其他两组(P<0.01,P<0.001),中等水平组和低水平组无显著差异(P=0.411,P=0.225),在一般任务的错误率上高水平组显著小于低水平组(P<0.05);2)在长距离按键反应中,高水平组的抑制优势进一步扩大,并且在与经验相关的任务中,中等水平组被试的动作抑制时间也显著小于低水平组(P<0.001)。 结论:与非运动员相比,高水平乒乓球运动员具有较好的行为抑制能力,这种抑制优势不仅体现在与运动经验相关的任务中,还能够迁移到一般认知任务中,而中等水平的乒乓球运动员只在与经验相关的任务中表现出行为抑制能力的优势,长距离的按键反应方式更能突出运动员的行为抑制能力特点。

关键词: 乒乓球, 运动经验, 行为抑制能力, 反应距

Abstract: Objective: To explore the characteristics of behavior inhibition (BI) of top table tennis players, and to learn the relationship between table tennis experience and BI. Methods: We assessed the effect of table tennis experience by Go/No-go task in high-level group, medium-level group and low-level group; experimental materials relevant and irrelevant to experience were selected; in addition, in order to improve the ecological validity, we attempted to change the Go/No-go task's reactive mode from press short-distance keys to press long-distance keys. Results: 1) In the short-distance key press task, the reactions of high-level group in general cognitive tasks were obviously shorter than the others (P<0.01, P<0.001) and the same in experience tasks (P<0.01, P<0.001). There was no difference between medium-level group and low-level group (P=0.411, P=0.225). The error rate of high-level group in experience task was obviously less than low-level group (P<0.05); 2) In the long-distance key press task, the BI advantage of high-level group further expanded, and the react time of medium-level group was obviously less than the low-level group in the task relevant to experience (P<0.001). Conclusions: Compared with beginners, elite table tennis players have better BI, whose advantage was not only embodied in task relevant to experience, but also could be transferred to the general cognitive tasks. The secondary table tennis players only had the advantage of BI in tasks relevant to experience.

Key words: table tennis, experience, behavioral inhibition, response distance

中图分类号: 


版权所有 © 《成都体育学院学报》编辑部
地址:中国 · 四川省成都市体院路2号 邮编:610041  电话:028-85095371 E-mail:cdtyxb1960@163.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发